2000
DOI: 10.1007/s002130000586
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nicotine self-administration and withdrawal: modulation of anxiety in the social interaction test in rats

Abstract: Nicotine self-administration is not maintained because of its anxiolytic effect, but despite, or because of, its anxiogenic effect. There was no evidence of an anxiogenic response after either 24 or 72 h of withdrawal and thus increased anxiety on withdrawal from nicotine does not seem to contribute to nicotine self-administration.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

4
49
1

Year Published

2002
2002
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
4
49
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The social interaction test introduced by File and Hyde (1978) has been validated as a measure of anxiety-like behavior in many investigations (File, 1980;Guy and Gardner, 1985;Irvine et al, 2001; see review by File and Seth, 2003). In this test, the amount of time animals actively interacted (ie, grooming, sniffing, boxing, or crawling over/ under each other) during a 5-min session is measured.…”
Section: Measurement Of Social Interactionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The social interaction test introduced by File and Hyde (1978) has been validated as a measure of anxiety-like behavior in many investigations (File, 1980;Guy and Gardner, 1985;Irvine et al, 2001; see review by File and Seth, 2003). In this test, the amount of time animals actively interacted (ie, grooming, sniffing, boxing, or crawling over/ under each other) during a 5-min session is measured.…”
Section: Measurement Of Social Interactionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The social interaction test, first introduced by File and Hyde (1978), has been validated as a measure of anxiety-like behavior in many investigations (File, 1980;Guy and Gardner, 1985;Irvine et al, 2001; see review by File and Seth, 2003). Testing was carried out under relatively low lighting in a square open field (60 cm 脗 60 cm, with 16 squares marked out on the floor); rats were unfamiliar with this environment (Overstreet et al, 2002).…”
Section: Measurement Of Social Interactionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This test involves placing a pair of animals in an arena and measuring the amount of time engaged in such behaviors as grooming, sniffing, crawling over or under, and boxing; locomotor activity is simultaneously recorded and provides a measure that is independent of social interaction (File, 1980). Social interaction has been repeatedly validated as an index of anxiety-related behavior because it is decreased following anxiety-provoking stimuli, such as bright lights or exposure to cat odor (File, 1980;File and Hyde, 1978), after administration of anxiogenic drugs (e.g., Battacharya et al, 1997;File and Lister, 1984;Guy and Gardner, 1985;Sams-Dodd, 1995) or following withdrawal from drugs of abuse, including ethanol (Andrews et al, 1997;File et al, 1989;Irvine et al, 2001;Kampov-Polevoy et al, 2000;Overstreet et al, 2002). Conversely, social interaction can be increased by prior exposure to the test arena (File, 1980;File and Hyde, 1978) or the administration of anxiolytic drugs at doses that have little effect on locomotor activity (Barnes et al, 1990;File, 1980;Lightowler et al, 1994).…”
Section: Social Interaction Testmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to File (1980), the most sensitive procedure is to match up pairs of rats that have the same treatment on the basis of their body weights and then treat the total number of interactions by the pair as the unit of measure. However, for other experiments where the index rat may have an implanted cannula (Gonzalez et al, 1998;Irvine et al, 2001), an untreated dummy partner is used, and only the interactions of the index rat are recorded. In the present studies, pairs of rats with the same treatment were placed in the arena and the social interactions initiated by each member of the pair were recorded, thereby requiring fewer rats.…”
Section: Social Interaction Testmentioning
confidence: 99%