PsycEXTRA Dataset 1985
DOI: 10.1037/e472512004-001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nicotine gum vs. placebo gum: Comparisons of withdrawal symptoms and success rates.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
1

Year Published

1986
1986
2007
2007

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
(40 reference statements)
0
4
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Heart rate, hunger, and weight gain appeared to be the exceptions to this time course. In prior studies, whether heart rate showed a time-limited, biphasic "withdrawal" pattern or a simple uniphasic decline postcessation is debatable (Nemeth-Coslett, Sampson, & Henningfield, 1986;Schneider & Jarvik, 1985;Ward, Garvey, & Bliss, 1992;West & Schneider, 1988). Unfortunately, our results (see Figure 1) do not help resolve the time pattern for heart rate postcessation.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 54%
“…Heart rate, hunger, and weight gain appeared to be the exceptions to this time course. In prior studies, whether heart rate showed a time-limited, biphasic "withdrawal" pattern or a simple uniphasic decline postcessation is debatable (Nemeth-Coslett, Sampson, & Henningfield, 1986;Schneider & Jarvik, 1985;Ward, Garvey, & Bliss, 1992;West & Schneider, 1988). Unfortunately, our results (see Figure 1) do not help resolve the time pattern for heart rate postcessation.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 54%
“…These effects are similar to those found in an earlier nicotine gum study which incorporated these scales Henningfield 1985, 1986). That the gum is probably not totally devoid of abuse liability, however, is suggested by other laboratory studies, which demonstrated that, when compared to placebo, nicotine gum is a reinforcer for smokers trying to quit (e.g., Russell et al 1980;Hughes et al 1985;Schneider et al 1985), and by smoking cessation treatment studies which showed that a small percentage of persons treated with the gum continue to use the gum for many months after they have ceased smoking (e.g., Russell et al 1980;Jarvis et al 1982).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The SCS was one of the early withdrawal measures (Schneider & Jarvik, 1985;Schneider, Jarvik, & Forsythe, 1984 [www.proqolid.org]). Twenty behavioral symptoms are rated on a 7-point scale and 10 physical symptoms are rated as present or not.…”
Section: Withdrawal Measuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…; (b) the Minnesota Withdrawal Scale (MNWS;; (c) the Mood and Physical Symptoms Scale (MPSS;West & Hajek, 2004); (d) theShiffman-Jarvik Withdrawal Scale (SJWS;Shiffman & Jarvik, 1976); (e) the Smoker Complaint Scale (SCS;Schneider & Jarvik, 1985); (f) the Wisconsin Smoking Withdrawal Scale (WSWS;Welsch et al, 1999); (g) the Profile of Mood States (POMS;McNair, Lorr, & Droppelman, 1992), four of the seven subscales of which tap valid abstinence symptoms; and (h) the Shiffman Scale (SS;Shiffman, Paty, Gnys, Kassel, & Elash, 1995), a very brief assessment via a hand-held computer.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%