2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.jinorgbio.2011.06.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nickel–quinolones interaction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
44
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 89 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 81 publications
7
44
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The stock solution of CT DNA gave a ratio of UV absorbance at 260 and 280 nm (A 260 /A 280 ) in the range of 1.8-1.9, indicating that the DNA was sufficiently free of protein contamination. The DNA concentration was determined by the UV absorbance at 260 nm after 1:20 dilution using ε =6600 M − 1 cm − 1 [49][50][51][52].…”
Section: Materials-instrumentation-physical Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The stock solution of CT DNA gave a ratio of UV absorbance at 260 and 280 nm (A 260 /A 280 ) in the range of 1.8-1.9, indicating that the DNA was sufficiently free of protein contamination. The DNA concentration was determined by the UV absorbance at 260 nm after 1:20 dilution using ε =6600 M − 1 cm − 1 [49][50][51][52].…”
Section: Materials-instrumentation-physical Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our recent studies have been focused on the study of divalent Co(II), Ni(II), Cu(II) or Zn(II) complexes with antimicrobial [10,[43][44][45][46][47][48][49][50] or antiinflammatory drugs [17,18,[51][52][53] in the absence or presence of N-donor(s) heterocyclic ligands. Taking into consideration the significance of the quinolones in medicine [1][2][3][4] and the fact that metal complexes with drugs may exhibit more pronounced biological properties in comparison to the free drugs, we have initiated the interaction of Cu(II) with quinolones [15,16,29,33,[36][37][38].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(Table 5) Moreover, from the results obtained for the four Ni(II) complexes, complex 3 showed the better activity may be due to the ethyl substitution in the terminal nitrogen of the ligand. From the above results, it can be concluded that the scavenging effects of the nickel salt, bis(diphenylphosphino)methane and free ligands is significantly less when compared to their corresponding Ni(II) complexes, which is mainly due to the chelation of the organic ligand with the Ni(II) ion [55,56]. …”
Section: Reductive Ability Assaymentioning
confidence: 92%
“…The UV spectra of a 2×10 (Table 4), suggesting that complex 2 has stronger intercalative binding ability to DNA than HCip and classical intercalator EB (K b =1.23(±0.07)×10 5 M − 1 ) [26][27][28].…”
Section: Study Of the Interaction With Uv Spectroscopymentioning
confidence: 99%