Conspectus
Transition-metal-catalyzed
C–O bond activation provides
a useful strategy for utilizing alcohol- and phenol-derived electrophiles
in cross-coupling reactions, which has become a research field of
active and growing interest in organic chemistry. The synergy between
computation and experiment elucidated the mechanistic model and controlling
factors of selectivities in these transformations, leading to advances
in innovative C–O bond activation and functionalization methods.
Toward the rational design of C–O bond activation, our collaborations
with the Jarvo group bridged the mechanistic models of C(sp2)–O and C(sp3)–O bond activations. We found
that the nickel catalyst cleaves the benzylic and allylic C(sp3)–O bonds via two general mechanisms: the stereoinvertive
SN2 back-side attack model and the stereoretentive chelation-assisted
model. These two models control the stereochemistry in a wide array
of stereospecific Ni-catalyzed cross-coupling reactions with benzylic
or allylic alcohol derivatives. Because of the catalyst distortion,
the ligands can differentiate the competing stereospecific C(sp3)–O bond activations. The PCy3 ligand interacts
with nickel mainly through σ-donation, and the Ni(PCy3) catalyst can undergo facile bending of the substrate–nickel–ligand
angle, which favors the stereoretentive benzylic C–O bond activation.
The N-heterocyclic carbene SIMes ligand has additional d(metal)–p(ligand)
back-donation with nickel, which leads to an extra energy penalty
for the same angle bending. This results in the preference of stereoinvertive
benzylic C–O bond activation under Ni/SIMes catalysis. In addition
to ligand control, a Lewis acid can increase the selectivity for stereoinvertive
C(sp3)–O activation by stabilizing the SN2 back-side attack transition state. The oxygen leaving group complexes
with the MgI2 Lewis acid in the stereoinvertive activation,
leading to the exclusive stereoinvertive Kumada coupling of benzylic
ethers. We also identified that the competing C(sp3)–O
bond activation models have noticeable differences in charge separation.
This leads to the solvent polarity control of the stereospecificity
in C(sp3)–O activations. Low-polarity solvents favor
the neutral stereoretentive C–O bond activation, while high-polarity
solvents favor the zwitterionic stereoinvertive cleavage.
In
sharp contrast to the nickel catalysts, the C(sp2)–O
bond activation under palladium catalysis mainly proceeds
via the classic three-membered ring oxidative addition mechanism instead
of the chelation-assisted mechanism. This is due to the lower oxophilicity
of palladium, which disfavors the oxygen coordination in the chelation-assisted-type
activation. The three-membered ring activation model selectively cleaves
the weak C–O bond, resulting in the exclusive chemoselectivity
of acyl C–O bond activation in Pd-catalyzed cross-coupling
reactions with aryl carboxylic acid derivatives. This explains the
overall acylation in the Pd-catalyzed Suzuki–Miyaura coupling
with aryl esters. In collaboration wi...