1998
DOI: 10.1016/s0940-9602(98)80038-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nichtinvasive Analyse des Knorpelvolumens und der Knorpeldicke im menschlichen Ellbogengelenk mittels MRT

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, a higher association was found with the local bone size (diameter of the tibial head and the humeral condyles, respectively; Eckstein et al 1998c;Springer et al 1998). In a sample of men (Eckstein et al 2001a), the correlations between cartilage volume and body weight/height were also found to be low (r=0.06 to 0.27/0.28 to 0.45 for the various cartilage plates, whereas the size of the bones was shown to display higher correlation coefficients with the cartilage volume (r=0.39 to 0.67).…”
Section: Scale Effects and Correlation With Anthropometric Variablesmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, a higher association was found with the local bone size (diameter of the tibial head and the humeral condyles, respectively; Eckstein et al 1998c;Springer et al 1998). In a sample of men (Eckstein et al 2001a), the correlations between cartilage volume and body weight/height were also found to be low (r=0.06 to 0.27/0.28 to 0.45 for the various cartilage plates, whereas the size of the bones was shown to display higher correlation coefficients with the cartilage volume (r=0.39 to 0.67).…”
Section: Scale Effects and Correlation With Anthropometric Variablesmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…A subsequent study in 27 adult men (Eckstein et al 2001a) confirmed that a high degree of variability is also present within one gender (CV% ~20%), and that the variability of cartilage volume is determined both by considerable variation in cartilage thickness and joint surface areas (CV% ~15%, respectively). A high interindividual variability has also been described in the elbow (Springer et al 1998) and in the joints of the hind foot (Al-Ali et al 2001).…”
Section: Inter-individual Variability and Side Differencesmentioning
confidence: 96%