Niche differentiation and symbiotic association among ammonia/nitrite oxidizers in a full-scale rotating biological contactor

Wang, Dou; Wang, Yulin; Liu, Lei; Chen, Yiqiang; Wang, Chunxiao; Xu, Xiaoqing; Yu, Yang; Wang, Yübo; Zhang, Tong

doi:10.1016/j.watres.2022.119137

Cited by 5 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 64 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…MAGs provide comprehensive coverage of the genetic diversity in a microbial community ( Asnicar et al, 2020 ; Kashaf et al, 2021 ), and predict the involvement of individual components in nutrient cycling ( Bendia et al, 2022 ) and symbiotic relationships ( Wang et al, 2022 ). Metatranscriptomics consists of sequencing and quantifying the relative abundance of mRNAs in a sample to determine the functional activities of a given microbiome ( Bashiardes et al, 2016 ).…”

Section: Good Practices In Future Cave Microbiome Studiesmentioning

confidence: 99%

The geomicrobiology of limestone, sulfuric acid speleogenetic, and volcanic caves: basic concepts and future perspectives

Turrini,

Chebbi,

Riggio

et al. 2024

Front. Microbiol.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Caves are ubiquitous subterranean voids, accounting for a still largely unexplored surface of the Earth underground. Due to the absence of sunlight and physical segregation, caves are naturally colonized by microorganisms that have developed distinctive capabilities to thrive under extreme conditions of darkness and oligotrophy. Here, the microbiomes colonizing three frequently studied cave types, i.e., limestone, sulfuric acid speleogenetic (SAS), and lava tubes among volcanic caves, have comparatively been reviewed. Geological configurations, nutrient availability, and energy flows in caves are key ecological drivers shaping cave microbiomes through photic, twilight, transient, and deep cave zones. Chemoheterotrophic microbial communities, whose sustenance depends on nutrients supplied from outside, are prevalent in limestone and volcanic caves, while elevated inorganic chemical energy is available in SAS caves, enabling primary production through chemolithoautotrophy. The 16S rRNA-based metataxonomic profiles of cave microbiomes were retrieved from previous studies employing the Illumina platform for sequencing the prokaryotic V3-V4 hypervariable region to compare the microbial community structures from different cave systems and environmental samples. Limestone caves and lava tubes are colonized by largely overlapping bacterial phyla, with the prevalence of Pseudomonadota and Actinomycetota, whereas the co-dominance of Pseudomonadota and Campylobacterota members characterizes SAS caves. Most of the metataxonomic profiling data have so far been collected from the twilight and transient zones, while deep cave zones remain elusive, deserving further exploration. Integrative approaches for future geomicrobiology studies are suggested to gain comprehensive insights into the different cave types and zones. This review also poses novel research questions for unveiling the metabolic and genomic capabilities of cave microorganisms, paving the way for their potential biotechnological applications.

show abstract