2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.actao.2007.08.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Niche analysis and conservation of the orchids of east Macedonia (NE Greece)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

6
96
0
2

Year Published

2008
2008
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(104 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
6
96
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…geological substrate was found as the most important factor that determined the conservation value. This is in accordance with the results of previous studies (dijk et al 1997;Tsiftsis et al 2008), which indicated the significance of soil properties in determining orchid distribution. in fact, geological substrate is a surrogate of soil properties.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…geological substrate was found as the most important factor that determined the conservation value. This is in accordance with the results of previous studies (dijk et al 1997;Tsiftsis et al 2008), which indicated the significance of soil properties in determining orchid distribution. in fact, geological substrate is a surrogate of soil properties.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…Surprisingly, vegetation type was not included in the regression tree model, although it is known to be closely related with the distribution of orchids (Tsiftsis et al 2008;Landi et al 2009). This can be attributed to the resolution of the vegetation data (grid cells of 1 km 2 ), which despite being adequate for conservation planning, it seems that it cannot ascribe the small scale differentiation of vegetation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If the values of species tolerance are lower, the species is considered a specialist. In contrast, generalists are assumed to live in a habitat with widely varying environmental conditions and thus they show higher values of species tolerance (Dolédec et al 2000, Heino & Soininen 2006, Tsiftsis et al 2008.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results are two measures, niche position and niche breadth. The position describes the location of the niche in the hypervolume and the breadth describes the corresponding expansion (Dolédec et al 2000;Heino and Soininen 2006;Tsiftsis et al 2008). With an analyses of only one species (or habitat), it is hardly possible to tell if this is a specialist or a generalist, the classification is therefore done in a comparative way.…”
Section: Methods 2: Outlying Mean Index (Omi)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, niche position describes the location (center) of the realized niche in the n-dimensional hypervolume. Niche breadth describes the tolerance of a species associated with the environmental parameters in the habitat, i.e., the expansion of the niche in the hypervolume (Dolédec et al 2000;Heino and Soininen 2006;Tsiftsis et al 2008).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%