2004
DOI: 10.1111/j.0038-4941.2004.08502003.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nice to Know You? Testing Contact, Cultural, and Group Threat Theories of Anti‐Black and Anti‐Hispanic Stereotypes*

Abstract: Objective. Many racial/ethnic policies in the United States-from desegregation to affirmative action policies-presume that contact improves racial/ethnic relations. Most research, however, tests related theories in isolation from one another and focuses on black-white contact. This article tests contact, cultural, and group threat theories to learn how contact in different interactive settings affects whites' stereotypes of blacks and Hispanics, now the largest minority group in the country. Method. We use mul… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

5
197
2
2

Year Published

2007
2007
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 231 publications
(211 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
5
197
2
2
Order By: Relevance
“…First and foremost, using national survey data from 1996 and 2005, we test whether individuallevel variation in concern over the welfare of others and a sense of duty to help those less 8 Dixon and Rosenbaum 2004;Hood and Morris 1997;Stein, Post, and Rinden 2000;Van Laar et al 2005. 9 See http://afsc.org/ well-off than oneself significantly reduces general opposition to immigration.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First and foremost, using national survey data from 1996 and 2005, we test whether individuallevel variation in concern over the welfare of others and a sense of duty to help those less 8 Dixon and Rosenbaum 2004;Hood and Morris 1997;Stein, Post, and Rinden 2000;Van Laar et al 2005. 9 See http://afsc.org/ well-off than oneself significantly reduces general opposition to immigration.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, despite a perceived lack in optimal conditions, more recent research suggests the interracial contact at school is a more effective mechanism in disconfirming racial and ethnic stereotypes than contact in other interactive settings such as one's community of residence or place of work. For example, Dixon and Rosenbaum (2004), in a recent empirical investigation on the effects of whites' contacts with blacks and Hispanics in different interactive settings, found that prior contact in a school environment was the primary factor in reducing racial prejudice. In other words, it was contact in the school and not in other interactive settings such as one's current community of residence, workplace, or even family contact, which emerged as the key and consistent factor in ameliorating anti-black and anti-Hispanic stereotypes among whites in this instance.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sherman and Clore (2009) discuss the idea that these color associations both reflect and contribute to racialization in the USA and the subsequent stereotyping of people with darker skin as immoral and criminal (Kinder 1986;MacLin and Herrera 2006;Sears and Henry 2003). More direct research on racial stereotyping in the USA using adjective association tests finds the existence of pervasive and consistent stereotypes about Blacks as being immoral, criminal, and ignorant (Brief et al 2000;Carton and Rosette 2011;Dixon and Rosenbaum 2004;Katz and Braly 1933;Kinder 1986;Rosette et al 2008). Further suggesting a link between racial stereotypes and ethical perceptions, Sears and Henry (2003) found Blacks in the USA are often viewed as violators of traditional American moral values.…”
Section: Stereotypes Race and Ethicsmentioning
confidence: 99%