Abstract:Recent research suggests that agreeable individuals experience greater financial hardship than their less agreeable peers. We explore the psychological mechanisms underlying this relationship and provide evidence that it is driven by agreeable individuals considering money to be less important, but not (as previously suggested) by agreeable individuals pursuing more cooperative negotiating styles. Taking an interactionist perspective, we further hypothesize that placing little importance on moneya risk factor … Show more
“…However, most previous psychological research has neglected to account for the spatial nature of the data in the statistical analyses. Specifically, to our knowledge, only four studies concerned with regional psychological differences have checked for spatial dependencies among error terms (Ebert et al, 2019, 2020; Matz & Gladstone, 2018; Webster & Duffy, 2016). Accordingly, it is conceivable that, at least some of the observed correlates of regional personality scores and PESH indicators were artifacts of spatial dependencies within the data.…”
Section: Limitations Of Past Work On Geographical Differences In Psyc...mentioning
There is growing evidence that psychological characteristics are spatially clustered across geographic regions and that regionally aggregated psychological characteristics are related to important outcomes. However, much of the evidence comes from research that relied on methods that are theoretically ill-suited for working with spatial data. The validity and generalizability of this work are thus unclear. Here we address two main challenges of working with spatial data (i.e., modifiable areal unit problem and spatial dependencies) and evaluate data-analysis techniques designed to tackle those challenges. To illustrate these issues, we investigate the robustness of regional Big Five personality differences and their correlates within the United States (Study 1; N = 3,387,303) and Germany (Study 2; N = 110,029). First, we display regional personality differences using a spatial smoothing approach. Second, we account for the modifiable areal unit problem by examining the correlates of regional personality scores across multiple spatial levels. Third, we account for spatial dependencies using spatial regression models. Our results suggest that regional psychological differences are robust and can reliably be studied across countries and spatial levels. The results also show that ignoring the methodological challenges of spatial data can have serious consequences for research concerned with regional psychological differences.
“…However, most previous psychological research has neglected to account for the spatial nature of the data in the statistical analyses. Specifically, to our knowledge, only four studies concerned with regional psychological differences have checked for spatial dependencies among error terms (Ebert et al, 2019, 2020; Matz & Gladstone, 2018; Webster & Duffy, 2016). Accordingly, it is conceivable that, at least some of the observed correlates of regional personality scores and PESH indicators were artifacts of spatial dependencies within the data.…”
Section: Limitations Of Past Work On Geographical Differences In Psyc...mentioning
There is growing evidence that psychological characteristics are spatially clustered across geographic regions and that regionally aggregated psychological characteristics are related to important outcomes. However, much of the evidence comes from research that relied on methods that are theoretically ill-suited for working with spatial data. The validity and generalizability of this work are thus unclear. Here we address two main challenges of working with spatial data (i.e., modifiable areal unit problem and spatial dependencies) and evaluate data-analysis techniques designed to tackle those challenges. To illustrate these issues, we investigate the robustness of regional Big Five personality differences and their correlates within the United States (Study 1; N = 3,387,303) and Germany (Study 2; N = 110,029). First, we display regional personality differences using a spatial smoothing approach. Second, we account for the modifiable areal unit problem by examining the correlates of regional personality scores across multiple spatial levels. Third, we account for spatial dependencies using spatial regression models. Our results suggest that regional psychological differences are robust and can reliably be studied across countries and spatial levels. The results also show that ignoring the methodological challenges of spatial data can have serious consequences for research concerned with regional psychological differences.
“…The negative relation with popularity is especially interesting. Among adults, lower levels of (Big Five; footnote 4) agreeableness have been found to be associated with higher income (Hill, Turiano, Mroczek, & Burrow, 2016;Judge, Livingston, & Hurst, 2012;Matz & Gladstone, 2018). Such outward manifestations of 'success'-if true among adolescents as well-may, in turn, be associated with higher levels of admiration and popularity among peers.…”
Getting along (i.e. to be liked) and getting ahead (i.e. to be popular) are two fundamental psychological motives that have important consequences for adolescents' well-being. Especially antisocial behavioural tendencies, which are less well covered by the Big Five than by the HEXACO model, have been shown to differentially predict likeability and popularity. In this study, possible differential relations between personality and likeability and popularity were investigated using the HEXACO Simplified Personality Inventory and sociometric measures of likeability and popularity among 552 (12 to 14 years old) adolescents. Results showed that agreeableness was the most important likeability predictor, whereas extraversion (positive), openness to experience, honesty-humility, and agreeableness (all three negative) were the most important popularity predictors. Facet-level analyses revealed that selected HEXACO facets (greed avoidance, fearfulness, social boldness, gentleness, prudence, perfectionism, aesthetic appreciation, and altruism) most strongly-and in opposite directions-differentiated in the prediction of likeability and popularity. Furthermore, none of the expected interactions but several masking and cancellation effects were observed. The results, which are also discussed in light of interpersonal circumplex, resource control strategies, hierarchical differentiation, and socioanalytic frameworks, suggest that-among early adolescents-differential personality predictors may make it difficult to both get along and get ahead.
“…We invite future research to examine the role of other psychological factors in explaining the overlap between health and financial behaviors, such as an individual's consideration of future consequences (Joireman et al ., 2010) and propensity to plan (Lynch et al ., 2010; Xiao and O'Neill, 2018). Moreover, future work could examine the underlying process of our findings, given recent work which finds that personality traits such as agreeableness are related to the importance one places on money, which again explains experiencing economic hardship (Matz and Gladstone, 2018).…”
Section: Implications Limitations and Conclusionmentioning
Both a healthy lifestyle and financially responsible behavior contribute to individual wellbeing and benefit society. Motivated by the fact that both types of behavior involve short-term sacrifices in exchange for uncertain long-term benefits and require self-control, we examine individuals' consistency in behavior across the health and financial domains. Using a large-scale data set of 3,752 employed Australians, we find that the majority of individuals behave in a consistently beneficial or detrimental way across both domains. This behavioral consistency relates to fundamental life outcomes, including physical and mental health, financial prosperity, and life satisfaction. In a new contribution to the literature, we show how personality traits-Locus of Control, the Big Five, Achievement Motivation-have a meaningful role in explaining the simultaneous pursuit of a healthy lifestyle and financially responsible behavior. These behavioral insights can guide policymakers in developing more effective strategies to steer individuals towards beneficial health and financial outcomes. Arvid O. I. Hoffmann and Leonora Risse contributed equally to this article.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.