2013
DOI: 10.1016/s2213-2600(13)70066-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

NICE guidance on omalizumab for severe asthma

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Clinical stopping rules should be developed for AIT, similarly to what is currently considered for biologics in severe asthma, as a guidance for continuing or stopping treatment after a short (early stopping rule) or long (late stopping rule) period. As an example, a global treatment evaluation after 16 weeks is used as an early stopping rule for omalizumab treatment (49,50).…”
Section: Accepted Articlementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Clinical stopping rules should be developed for AIT, similarly to what is currently considered for biologics in severe asthma, as a guidance for continuing or stopping treatment after a short (early stopping rule) or long (late stopping rule) period. As an example, a global treatment evaluation after 16 weeks is used as an early stopping rule for omalizumab treatment (49,50).…”
Section: Accepted Articlementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA) strategy, omalizumab, mepolizumab and reslizumab represent the first (and, currently, only) therapies for severe asthma (step 5) (data sourced from GINA: ginasthma.org). The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence, UK (NICE) proposed alternative guidance for omalizumab in 2013 [17], reviewed in 2016, and for mepolizumab and reslizumab in 2017 (table 1).…”
Section: From Guidelines To Care Pathwaysmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Existing therapies, available beyond step 5 asthma, include Omalizumab, which is used for a specific sub-group of allergic patients who meet the National Institute for Clinical Excellence (NICE) guidelines criteria. 16 This is an example of a therapy that has emerged from research over the last 10 years to change the management for a small proportion (estimated between 10% and 15%) 17 of all patients with severe asthma. Recent real-life studies, both in the UK and internationally, have demonstrated that, in clinical practice, the observed benefits and response rates (approximately 70%) are higher than was experienced during clinical trials.…”
Section: Existing Approaches Used At or Beyond Stepmentioning
confidence: 99%