2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.molstruc.2022.134887
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ni(II), Pd(II) and Pt(II) complexes with SNO-group thiosemicarbazone and DMSO: Synthesis, characterization, DFT, molecular docking and cytotoxicity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
29
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

4
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The negative sign of the chemical potential for the examined complexes showed that the complexes were stable 82 . It is more probable for the substance to behave electrophilically because its electrophilicity index is high and its chemical potential value is low 83 …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The negative sign of the chemical potential for the examined complexes showed that the complexes were stable 82 . It is more probable for the substance to behave electrophilically because its electrophilicity index is high and its chemical potential value is low 83 …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…As a sign of this, the presence of softness encourages biological action, whereas the presence of hardness inhibits it. 81 As a result, the following ought to be the sequence in which reactions take place, in descending order from least numerous to most plentiful: CuTeQ is superior to NiTeQ, then CoLQ, as shown in Table 3.…”
Section: Deduction Of Complex Constructionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To perform a comparative study of the relative stability of the studied complexes, the binding energy (BE) or the complexation energy of the studied complexes was calculated, Table S1, as follows: E binding 0.25em ( Cr false( III false) complex ) = E complex ( E Metal cation + 2 E ligand + E Cl anion + E H 2 O ) E binding 0.25em ( Fe false( III false) complex ) = E complex ( E Metal cation + 2 E ligand + E Cl anion + E H 2 O ) E binding 0.25em ( Mn false( II false) complex ) = E complex ( E Metal cation + 2<...…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to observations of perturbation energy E (2) for various transitions between these donors and acceptors, the Supporting Information file, the following transitions for free ligands are extremely likely to occur; for free ligands; C1−C3 → C2−C4 (132. 62 Using NBO calculations, significant knowledge on the structures and characteristics of the Cr(III), Mn(II), and Fe(III) complexes was collected. The NBO analysis of the compounds indicated substantial inter-and intramolecular interactions between the acceptor NBOs and the donor NBOs.…”
Section: Natural Charge Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%