2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.apcata.2006.04.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ni(Co)-Mo-W sulphide unsupported HDS catalysts by ex situ decomposition of alkylthiomolybdotungstates

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It was observed that the thermal decomposition of molybdenum and tungsten thiosalts is an effective method for the production of improved unsupported catalysts. One reason is that no metal-sulfur bond formation is required which is necessary applying the oxide route [16][17][18][19]. However, to the best of our knowledge only a few studies have been performed to investigate supported MoS 2 catalysts derived from ammonium thiomolybdate (ATM) as precursor [20,21].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was observed that the thermal decomposition of molybdenum and tungsten thiosalts is an effective method for the production of improved unsupported catalysts. One reason is that no metal-sulfur bond formation is required which is necessary applying the oxide route [16][17][18][19]. However, to the best of our knowledge only a few studies have been performed to investigate supported MoS 2 catalysts derived from ammonium thiomolybdate (ATM) as precursor [20,21].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unsupported Ni(Co)-Mo sulfide catalysts, without carbon, generally show a decrease in surface area after HDS whereas that for unsupported Ni(Co)-Mo sulfide catalysts, prepared from precursors containing alky groups, present an increase after the catalytic reaction. For example, NiMoW-H sample showed a decrease in surface area after HDS whereas that for NiMoW-methyl presented an increase after the catalytic reaction [20]. Moreover, Co/MoS 2 ex situ lost about 50% of its surface area during the test while Co/C 1 -MoS 2 ex situ and Co/C 3 -MoS 2 ex situ showed an increase of their surface area [15].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…A solution of 1.54 g of (CH 3 ) 4 NBr in100 mL CH 3 [20]. In the same way, Ni/(NH 4 ) 2 MoS 4 was decomposed to form Ni-promoted MoS 2 particles which did not contain carbon, labeled as Ni/MoS 2 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The highest segregation from nickel sulfide phases is observed for Ni 0.5 MoW-ex situ catalyst and could affect its catalytic activity behavior. This segregation effect might be ascribed to limited accommodation of Ni on Mo(W) 2 slabs due to an increased crystallization rate [22]. It is suggested that the nickel species in the sample catalysts are located mainly on the edges of Mo(W) sulfides.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%