NHS librarians collaborate to develop a search bank peer reviewing and sharing COVID‐19 searches: an evaluation

Abstract

Background Responding to the COVID‐19 pandemic, Health Education England (HEE) mobilised a group of expert searchers from NHS libraries in England to develop a platform for librarians to share peer reviewed search strategies and results on the Knowledge for Healthcare website. Objectives (1) To document the origins of the COVID‐19 search bank, (2) evaluate attitudes of NHS librarians in England towards the search bank and (3) identify lessons learned and consider whether the initiative might be developed further. Methods Structured interviews with the peer reviewers ( n = 10) were conducted, and a questionnaire survey of the NHS library community using the search bank was undertaken. Results The interviews confirmed the value of collaboration. Expert searchers worked in pairs to peer review submitted search strategies. The survey (85 responses) indicated that a majority had used the search bank, and approved of the project, with some differences of opinion on functionality and future developments. Discussion Collaborative working for the search bank probably saved time for individual NHS librarians. The quality of the searches submitted was variable as were librarians' approaches to presentation and development of search strategies. Peer review benefits from a buddy approach among expert searchers and agreement about feedback provided to contributors. Conclusion Search strategies are the most useful element of a search bank. Peer review can be challenging and would benefit from a formal structure, but it is professionally rewarding.

In this issue…

“…When it comes to searching there is much we can learn from one another, as demonstrated by Gorring et al (2022) in their evaluation of the collaborative development of a search bank for sharing and peer reviewing search strategies. Combining structured interviews with a questionnaire survey ( n = 85) of the UK NHS library community, Gorring et al found that respondents valued collaboration, believing that the quality of searches benefited from the paired buddy system to peer review submitted search strategies.…”