2023
DOI: 10.3390/molecules28093916
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

NH2-Modified UiO-66: Structural Characteristics and Functional Properties

Abstract: The development of new functional materials based on metal–organic frameworks (MOFs) for adsorption and catalytic applications is one of the promising trends of modern materials science. The Zr-based MOFs, specifically UiO-66, are considered as the supports for metallic catalysts for the 5-hydroxymethylfurfural platform molecule reduction into valuable products. The present work focused on the effect of NH2 modification of UiO-66 on its structure and functional properties. The samples were prepared by a solvot… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
(72 reference statements)
2
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This confirms the successful synthesis of UiO-66 and its derivatives in the experimental procedure. Notably, both functionalized and pristine UiO-66 demonstrate identical topology, in accordance with existing literature findings. However, upon careful scrutiny, it becomes apparent that the distinct peak profiles of UiO-66-(SH) 2 and UiO-66-(COOH) 2 exhibit a slightly broader nature when compared to those of other functionalized UiO-66 crystals. This observation implies that lower crystallinity may serve as a contributing factor.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…This confirms the successful synthesis of UiO-66 and its derivatives in the experimental procedure. Notably, both functionalized and pristine UiO-66 demonstrate identical topology, in accordance with existing literature findings. However, upon careful scrutiny, it becomes apparent that the distinct peak profiles of UiO-66-(SH) 2 and UiO-66-(COOH) 2 exhibit a slightly broader nature when compared to those of other functionalized UiO-66 crystals. This observation implies that lower crystallinity may serve as a contributing factor.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…As expected, the thermogravimetric analysis profiles of the two materials are like those previously reported and confirm the thermal stability of MOF-808 up to about 500 °C and up to 400 °C for UiO-66-NH2 (Figure 5d) [45,46]. The FT-IR and FT-Raman spectra obtained for both the Zr-based MOF-based materials reveal the main vibrational band characteristics as expected from the two MOF structures (Figure 5a,b; spectra shown in the 1900-400 cm −1 wavenumber region) [42,43]. Briefly, the medium and strong intensity bands to vibrational modes of the carboxylate groups can be assigned from 1600 to 1390 cm −1 ; a vibrational band around 1450 cm −1 ascribed to aromatic (C-C) bonds of the organic ligands; as well as a group of vibrational bands associated with Zr-(µ 3 -O) framework bonds in the range of 800-600 cm −1 , and a band (FT-IR) around 450 cm −1 assigned to Zr-(OC) bonds.…”
Section: Preparation and Characterization Of The Catalystssupporting
confidence: 87%
“…With the addition of acetic acid, the defective UiO-66-NH 2 displayed a significant uptake of N 2 gas at low pressures, confirming the presence of micropores. Additionally, the defective material showed slight adsorption–desorption hysteresis in the range of 0.8 < P / P 0 < 1.0, further indicating the existence of additional mesopores in the adsorbent . The pore size distribution graph showed an increase in the number of mesopores (2–50 nm), indicating the possible presence of additional mesoporous structures in the defective material (Figure d,e).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Additionally, the defective material showed slight adsorption− desorption hysteresis in the range of 0.8 < P/P 0 < 1.0, further indicating the existence of additional mesopores in the adsorbent. 47 The pore size distribution graph showed an increase in the number of mesopores (2−50 nm), indicating the possible presence of additional mesoporous structures in the defective material (Figure 3d,e). Table S3 reveals that the BET surface area of the defective material was greater than that of the nondefective material, encompassing surface area, pore volume, and average mesopore diameter, with a range of 715 to 1154 m 2 •g −1 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%