2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.micpath.2022.105506
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

NGS analysis of nasopharyngeal microbiota in SARS-CoV-2 positive patients during the first year of the pandemic in the Campania Region of Italy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

9
20
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
9
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar observations were published by Stewart et al, who reported strong interrelationships between Streptococcus ‐dominant nasal microbiome and symptoms of viral bronchiolitis 7 . Our past studies revealed that COVID‐19 patients with severe outcomes had a nasopharyngeal district with reduced Proteobacteria and increased Rothia mucilaginosa, Streptococcus oralis , and bacterial species belonging to the genera Prevotella and Veillonella 8 . One of the most underestimated aspects of the microbiome is bacteriophages (phages).…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 81%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Similar observations were published by Stewart et al, who reported strong interrelationships between Streptococcus ‐dominant nasal microbiome and symptoms of viral bronchiolitis 7 . Our past studies revealed that COVID‐19 patients with severe outcomes had a nasopharyngeal district with reduced Proteobacteria and increased Rothia mucilaginosa, Streptococcus oralis , and bacterial species belonging to the genera Prevotella and Veillonella 8 . One of the most underestimated aspects of the microbiome is bacteriophages (phages).…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…Furthermore, about 54% of the remained reads per sample were mapped on the human reference genome and were excluded from the downstream analysis, resulting in a total of 43 184 475 reads per sample (range 4 610 220–147 612 628 reads) that passed the “Quality Control module.” On the entire data set more than 358 million reads were mapped on a viral database, corresponding to 18% of analyzed reads per sample (mean: 6 510 568; range: 1718–40 900 812). Only sequences that matched on phages have been considered in this paper as virus and bacteria presence have been already described respectively in Giugliano et al 8 and Ferravante et al 14 A total of six phage families that passed filters (phage entities were retained if they had a minimum of three reads associated in at least 50% of samples analyzed), were considered as detected in the 55 nasopharyngeal swabs taken from the patients infected with SARS‐CoV‐2. The RPM mean value of the six phage families detected, related to the three waves, different degrees of severity as well as the age quartile groups are reported in Table 2 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations