2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.puhe.2021.10.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

NFI, a clinical scoring tool for predicting non-alcoholic fatty liver in the Chinese population

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…By contrast, the predictive value of UHR was still present, no matter the gender or level of liver functioning, making it a more reliable indicator for patients with different clinical profiles. Currently, liver biopsy is considered as the gold standard for assessing the severity of NAFLD steatosis, but it is not suitable for large-scale screening, due to its invasive nature, as well as the possibility of sampling errors [11]. In this study, NAFLD was diagnosed by ultrasound, though this has the limitation of being unable to determine NAFLD severity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…By contrast, the predictive value of UHR was still present, no matter the gender or level of liver functioning, making it a more reliable indicator for patients with different clinical profiles. Currently, liver biopsy is considered as the gold standard for assessing the severity of NAFLD steatosis, but it is not suitable for large-scale screening, due to its invasive nature, as well as the possibility of sampling errors [11]. In this study, NAFLD was diagnosed by ultrasound, though this has the limitation of being unable to determine NAFLD severity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, Zhao et al [11] performed step-to-multiple logistic regression analysis on 1000 samples and obtained the NAFLD index (NFI), which includes ALT/ AST and TG, as a clinical scoring tool for predicting NAFLD. Accordingly, we compared the predictive value of UHR for NAFLD onset in non-obese adults to other indicators recently proposed in the literature [34][35][36][37][38].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Yet, because of NAFLD often being associated with obesity, NAFLD in lean patients, especially pre-diabetics with normal blood lipid levels, are often overlooked until liver damage has progressed to the point of developing symptoms. Currently, liver biopsy is the gold standard for NAFLD diagnosis, but it has significant limitations due to high expenses, invasiveness, as well as risks for sampling errors and complications [ 19 ]. Therefore, a non-invasive approach for diagnosing and/or predicting NAFLD onset has been of great interest; numerous researchers have developed various predictive models, using a variety of biomarkers, such as from Zhang et al, whose model incorporated gender, age, BMI, triglycerides (TG) and other indicators to evaluate NAFLD risk in T2DM [ 20 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Owing to the lack of obvious symptoms at the early stages, most patients end up diagnosed with HCC after it has progressed to its advanced stages, contributing to its extremely low overall five-year survival rates of < 16% [1][2][3][4]. Currently, HCC is diagnosed based on a combination of serological, radiological, and pathological features, with liver biopsy being considered the gold standard; however, the procedure is limited by its invasiveness and risks for sampling errors [5]. As a result, alternative approaches for diagnosing HCC has been developed, such as imaging technologies, though this has its own shortcomings.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%