2018
DOI: 10.31384/jisrmsse/(2018).16.2.2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nexus of Institutional Quality and Stock Market Development: Long-Run Relationships in Dynamic Heterogeneous Panel

Abstract: The current study is intended to analyze the relationship between stock market development and institutional quality. The study is based on the evidence of VISTA alliance for the period of 1984 to 2012. The outcomes of the panel ARDL (PMG) revealed that high regulatory quality, government effectiveness and rule of law, positively affect stock market development in the long-run. While political stability and control over corrupt practices have a significantly negative effect on stock market development. This st… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

2
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
(28 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the credit rating theory is beneficial to analyze the strength of the financial market (Gehrig & Stenbacka, 2007). The countries which significantly enhance the organizational performance as well as maintain good standards of accountability are positively correlated with significant confidence on equity financing by the investors in the country (Meo et al, 2018).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the credit rating theory is beneficial to analyze the strength of the financial market (Gehrig & Stenbacka, 2007). The countries which significantly enhance the organizational performance as well as maintain good standards of accountability are positively correlated with significant confidence on equity financing by the investors in the country (Meo et al, 2018).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To determine the effect of shareholder distraction on merger performance, following Meo et al (2018), equation 6.4 was used:…”
Section: Effect Of Shareholders' Distraction On Merger Performancementioning
confidence: 99%