2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.09.041
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nexus between Political Instability and Economic Growth in Pakistan

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
29
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
29
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In modern politico-economic research, coalition governments are considered a threat to the economy [21]. Moreover, there are few recent studies that identified terrorism as a cause of slower economic growth [22][23][24]. In our study, there is not a high risk of terrorism in the analysed study and this keyword was not searched on the Internet in many regions of these countries.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…In modern politico-economic research, coalition governments are considered a threat to the economy [21]. Moreover, there are few recent studies that identified terrorism as a cause of slower economic growth [22][23][24]. In our study, there is not a high risk of terrorism in the analysed study and this keyword was not searched on the Internet in many regions of these countries.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Dealing with uncertain economic conditions Kletzer (1997) argued that any change in policy concerning the future debt depends on the current shock to the economy. Tabassam et al (2016) maintained that due to disruption of the economic activities by the terrorism in Pakistan, the GDP is badly affected. These uncertainties changed the decision of risk avert foreign investor to invest in the hostile economic environment which eventually deterred growth.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This study explains the debt and growth nexus in reference to the role of uncertainty. We incorporate as why the uncertainty (economic as well as political) explains the relation more than any other previous study?Some of the literature focused on the performance of debt to uncertain economic conditions (Penalver& Thwaites, 2006;Catão&Kapur, 2006;Kletzer, 1997) while other gauged the relation separately with political instability (Van &Weder, 2009;Tabassam, Hashmi &Rehman, 2016). This study also controls the other macroeconomic determinants of debt and explains the relation simultaneously to avoid the endogeneity and simultaneity bias.Further, the GARCH based uncertainty measure provides an edge from all the previous studies framing risk as a macroeconomic determinant.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Taking over GSCM initiatives needs additional endeavors and also higher cost and it has less visible economic benefits from these initiatives [29,30]. In this situation, the value of national money will decrease and prices will increase, which empowers hesitation between customers and investors.…”
Section: Economic Benefits (S7)mentioning
confidence: 99%