Nexus between indigenous ecological knowledge and ecosystem services: a socio-ecological analysis for sustainable ecosystem management

Abstract

The well-being of the human society cannot be ensured and sustainable unless the ow of Ecosystem Services (ESs) would be matching with their consistent demand. The consistent ow of ESs required sustainable management of ecological resources of the ecosystem. The management of ecosystem can be ensured with variety of approaches. Integration of indigenous ecological knowledge (IEK) in management prescription with the view that IEK based extraction of ESs ensures removal of resources from the ecosystem within the limit thereby ensuring the sustainability of ecosystem. Present study is an evaluation to understand the nexus between ESs and IEK for sustainable environmental management. The focus of the study was a tribal dominated socio-ecological patch of Barind Region of Malda district, Eastern India. The assessment of ESs and IEK was based on the data collected from the randomly selected tribal households following the pre-tested questionnaire containing questions on ESs as per millennium ecosystem assessment. The data were analyzed following social preference approach, and statistical tests (Krushkal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney).General linear model (GLM) has also been used to examine the impact of socio-demographic attributes on the perceived valuation of ESs. The results revealed that the provisioning ESs (such as water, fuel wood, medical plants) was most preferred followed by cultural and regulating ESs by tribal. Differential importance of ESs was observed among tribal and accounted by gender, education as well as age of the tribe. A gap between the actual accessibility and evaluation of ESs by the tribal communities was also apparent. The socio-demographic attributes have an immense impact on the valuation of ecosystem services and also governed based on the IEK. Various types of indigenous ecological belief systems were closely linked with conservation of ecosystem and sustainable supply of ESs. Present study can contribute to understand socio-ecological nexus with the lens of IEK in tribal dominated ecological landscapes for improved ecosystem and environmental management besides ensuring sustainability of ow of ecosystem services. HighlightsA nexus exits between Indigenous Ecological Knowledge (IEK) and Ecosystem Services (ESs).Tribal livelihood revolves around ESs particularly provisioning ecosystem services.IEK are crucial for the ecological management in tribal landscapes.Socio-demographic factors govern to perceive value of ESs.

Integration of traditional ecological knowledge and western science in natural resources management in the Okavango Delta, Botswana

“…This implies that sacred places were cleared of vegetation cover and people could no longer regard such places as sacred. This concurs with Das et al (2020) who opine that competition for space results in people utilising sacred places with the consequence of the sacredness of such places being undervalued.…”

Patterns and Predictors of Medicinal Plant Use among Ethnolinguistic Groups in the 21st Century Philippines

“…Indigenous peoples serve as essential stewards of nature, are deeply connected to it through their customs and practices, and play an important role in conserving biodiversity, preserving the environment, and promoting sustainable ecosystem services (Abas et al, 2022). Across generations, they have accumulated a wealth of traditional ecological knowledge (TEK) (Abas et al, 2022), covering complex insights into local ecosystems, species behaviours, and sustainable resource management strategies (Das et al, 2022;Sangha et al, 2018;Tanalgo, 2017). Their management practices, guided by the principles of reciprocity and respect for the natural world, have signi cantly contributed to the conservation of biodiversity (Díaz et al, 2019;Posey, 1999;Von Der Porten et al, 2019).…”

Sociodemographic, environmental and biological factors affecting uses of plants from open ecosystems: Insights for improved livelihoods and biodiversity conservation

“…1: carbonization; 2: overexploitation of roots for medicine; 3: overexploitation for wood (technology); 4: species ecology; 5: extensive agriculture; 7: cut to avoid habitation by evil spirits. Ahoyo et al 10.3389/fcosc.2023.1127567 Frontiers in Conservation Science frontiersin.org Sociodemographic attributes have an immense impact on the valuation of ecosystem services and govern indigenous ecological knowledge (Das et al, 2022). Hence, they determine the usefulness of a species and contribute to the tailoring of vegetation patches.…”