Nexus between financial development and CO2 emissions in Saudi Arabia: analyzing the role of globalization

Abstract

This study examines the contribution of financial development to environmental degradation in Saudi Arabia in the period from 1971 to 2016, controlling the model for globalization and electricity consumption. The autoregressive distributive lag (ARDL) and vector error correction methods (VECM) are applied to the long-run and causal relationship, respectively. Empirical results indicate that financial development contributes to CO emissions and degrades environmental quality. The results also show that the role of globalization in environmental degradation is insignificant and that electricity consumption is the main culprit behind the growing CO emissions in Saudi Arabia. In addition, bidirectional causality exists between globalization and CO emissions in the long run, and financial development and CO emissions Granger-cause each other. Insights from the study help policymakers to understand the roles of financial development and globalization in environmental degradation and to comply with global mandate for the reduction of CO emissions.

The symmetrical and asymmetrical effects of foreign direct investment and financial development on carbon emission: evidence from Nigeria

“…The study revealed that the long-run growth effect of FDI inflow on carbon emissions is quite large. Meanwhile, Yanchun [108] conducted a similar study in China found a significant negative impact of FDI on carbon emissions. Kim [56] investigates the relationship between carbon emissions, FDI, and energy consumption using a data of "Asian Newly Industrialized Countries (ANICS)".…”

Renewable and nonrenewable energy consumption, trade and CO2 emissions in high emitter countries: does the income level matter?

“…Future research could be conducted on a larger sample with more determinants of carbon for a different panel of countries. Similarly, the study may be enhanced by adding significant variables to the model, such as economic complexity (U. Shahzad, Z. Fareed et al 2020); COVID-19 role in air quality and pollution (F. Fareed et al 2020;Iqbal et al 2020), imported technology (Danish, Wang, and Wang 2018); financial development (Xu et al 2018) and information and telecommunication (Danish, Khan, et al 2018;Latif et al 2018). Further, future studies could extend this model with other economic and non-economic variables, such as forests, health outcomes, technology, etc.…”

Modeling the dynamic linkage between financial development, energy innovation, and environmental quality: Does globalization matter?

“…Meanwhile, globalization facilitates financial sector reforms in both developing and developed countries, through which it can stimulate financial development and economic growth (Xu, Baloch, Meng, Zhang, & Mahmood, 2018). In the same way, financial development provides customers greater access to easy loans.…”

“…However, it is hard for any single country to address energy and environmental challenges alone (International Energy Agency, 2019). Nevertheless, globalization also affects environmental quality through various channels (Xu et al, 2018).…”