Nexus among biomass energy consumption, economic growth, and financial development: Evidence from selected 15 countries

Kevser, Mustafa; Tekbaş, Murat; Doğan, Mesut; Köylüoğlu, A. Selçuk

doi:10.1016/j.egyr.2022.06.033

Cited by 23 publications

(11 citation statements)

References 51 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Following the studies of Agboola et al [50]; Altay Topcu and Dogan [56]; Kevser et al [57]; Dogan et al [58]; Belloumi and Touati [55]; Burlea-Schiopoiu et al [53]; Shahbaz et al [59] as determinants of Y, the model is developed for Kazakhstan. The empirical model indicating the relationship among the variables organized for this purpose is as follows.…”

Section: Data and Econometric Methodologymentioning

confidence: 99%

The Nexus Between ICT, Trade Openness, Urbanization, Natural Resources, Foreign Direct Investment and Economic Growth

Sutbayeva,

Abdeshov,

Shodyrayeva

et al. 2024

IJSDP

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This study aimed to identify the determinants of economic growth (Y) in Kazakhstan over the period 1990-2022. In other words, the effects of urbanization (URB), natural resources (NR), trade openness (TO), foreign direct investment (FDI), and ICT variables on Y were to be determined. In the study, ARDL method and Vector Error Correction Model (VECM) were employed to determine the short and long-term effects. As a result of the analysis, it was found that URB, TO, FDI, and ICT increased Y in the short and long run. On the other hand, NR did not affect Y. The results of the VECM revealed a bilateral causality between URB, TO, FDI, ICT, and Y in the short and long run. Finally, no causality was found between NR and Y. These findings may help policymakers in realizing Kazakhstan's economic development goals.

show abstract

Section: Data and Econometric Methodologymentioning

confidence: 99%

The Nexus Between ICT, Trade Openness, Urbanization, Natural Resources, Foreign Direct Investment and Economic Growth

Sutbayeva,

Abdeshov,

Shodyrayeva

et al. 2024

IJSDP

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Bioenergy, nowadays, is gaining more attention among different renewable energy sources such as solar energy, wind energy, geothermal energy, marine energy, and hydroelectric power . Bioenergy is defined as energy materials derived from organic raw materials such as plants, animals, or microorganisms, such as wood, crop residues, agricultural waste, biomass leftovers, and industrial waste . Bioenergy offers several advantages and disadvantages as a sustainable energy source.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“… 9 Bioenergy is defined as energy materials derived from organic raw materials such as plants, animals, or microorganisms, such as wood, crop residues, agricultural waste, biomass leftovers, and industrial waste. 10 Bioenergy offers several advantages and disadvantages as a sustainable energy source. To begin with, bioenergy is ecologically beneficial.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Kinetic and Thermodynamic Characteristics of Torrefied Acer palmatum

Lu,

Song,

Wang

et al. 2024

ACS Omega

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The goal of this research was to investigate the effects of torrefying temperature (220, 260, and 300 °C) on the physicochemical properties, kinetics, thermodynamic parameters, and reaction processes of Acer palmatum (AP) during the pyrolysis process. The kinetics of raw materials and torrefied biomass were studied by using three kinetic models, and the main function graph approach was employed to find the reaction mechanism. The torrefied biomass produced at temperatures of 220 °C (AP-220), 260 °C (AP-260), and 300 °C (AP-300) was thermogravimetrically analyzed at four different heating rates (5, 10, 15, and 20 °C/min). In comparison to the raw material, the average activation energy of torrefied biomass declined with increasing temperature, from 174.13 to 84.67 kJ/mol (FWO), 172.52 to 81.24 kJ/mol (KAS and DAEM). The volatile contents of AP and AP-220 are higher than those of AP-260 and AP-300, indicating that the random nucleation model occupies the central position. Compared with the raw biomass, the average Gibbs free energy (ΔG) of torrefied biomass increased from 157.97 to 195.38 kJ/mol. The mean enthalpy change (ΔH) during the torrefaction process is positive, while the mean entropy change (ΔS) of the torrefaction of biomass is negative, decreasing from 16.93 to −151.53 kJ/mol (FWO) and from 14.36 to −156.06 kJ/mol (KAS and DAEM). Overall, the findings provide a comprehensive understanding of the kinetics and improved features of torrefied biomass as a high-quality solid fuel.

show abstract

“…Development of energy recovery efficiency from biomass is one of the most important ways of keeping our environment sustainable. Lignocellulosic biomass is one of the most available alternative sources of energy and accounts for approximately 14% of renewable energy consumption worldwide [ 3 ]. In the last decade, the use of lignocellulosic biomass agricultural residues as alternative to generate various kinds of energy vector biomolecules, has gained increasing interest because of its several interesting features including diversity, sustainability, and low GHG emissions [ 4 ].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Optimization of energy recovery efficiency from sweet sorghum stems by ethanol and methane fermentation processes coupling

Hamadou,

Djomdi,

Zieba Falama

et al. 2023

Bioengineered

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Taken separately, a single sweet sorghum stem bioconversion process for bioethanol and biomethane production only leads to a partial conversion of organic matter. The direct fermentation of crushed whole stem coupled with the methanization of the subsequent solid residues in a two-stage process was experimented to improve energy bioconversion yield, efficiency, and profitability. The raw stalk calorific value was 17,144.17 kJ/kg DM. Fermentation step performed using Saccharomyces cerevisiae resulted in a bioconversion yield of 261.18 g Eth/kg DM, i.e . an energy recovery efficiency of 6921.27 kJ/kg DM. The methanogenic potentials were 279 and 256 LCH 4 /kg DM, respectively, for raw stem and fermentation residues, i.e . energy yields of 10,013.31 and 9187.84 kJ/kg DM, respectively. Coupling processes have significantly increased yield and made it possible to reach 13,309.57 kJ/kg DM, i.e . 77.63% of raw stem energy recovery yield, compared to 40.37% and 58.40%, respectively, for single fermentation and methanization processes.

show abstract

Nexus among biomass energy consumption, economic growth, and financial development: Evidence from selected 15 countries

Cited by 23 publications

References 51 publications

The Nexus Between ICT, Trade Openness, Urbanization, Natural Resources, Foreign Direct Investment and Economic Growth

The Nexus Between ICT, Trade Openness, Urbanization, Natural Resources, Foreign Direct Investment and Economic Growth

Kinetic and Thermodynamic Characteristics of Torrefied Acer palmatum

Optimization of energy recovery efficiency from sweet sorghum stems by ethanol and methane fermentation processes coupling

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About