2003
DOI: 10.1300/j082v45n02_15
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nextext

Abstract: Gay men who are marked as "sexual outlaws" have unique and tense relationships with social regulatory forces, and for the porn star, the tensions are exacerbated. Surveillance, attraction, seduction, repulsion, authority, and discipline mark the communicative dynamics between the bodies of subject/object, performer/spectator, image-maker/imagined. This essay, which is a follow-up to "Sextext," is a fictional account of a porn star who navigates personal and social relationships in the context of a culture that… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…a politics of change, as deployed in queer projects, constitutes much of current autoethnographic work as many autoethnographers intentionally, politically try to make ideological and discursive trouble (Butler 1990a, see Corey and Nakayama 1997, Foster 2008, Jeffries 2002, Johnson 2001, Lee 2003, Nakayama and Corey 2003, Owen 2003, Pelias 1999, Rambo 2007, Taylor 2000.…”
Section: A Politics Of Changementioning
confidence: 99%
“…a politics of change, as deployed in queer projects, constitutes much of current autoethnographic work as many autoethnographers intentionally, politically try to make ideological and discursive trouble (Butler 1990a, see Corey and Nakayama 1997, Foster 2008, Jeffries 2002, Johnson 2001, Lee 2003, Nakayama and Corey 2003, Owen 2003, Pelias 1999, Rambo 2007, Taylor 2000.…”
Section: A Politics Of Changementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Queer theory is criticized for being too dense and difficult, and not personal enough (Burlington & Butler, 1999;Halberstam, 2005). Autoethnographers (e.g., Adams, 2009;Boylorn, 2006;Ellis, 2009;Holman Jones, 2005a;Pelias, 2009) and queer theorists (Butler, 2004;Corey & Nakayama, 1997;Nakayama & Corey, 2003) have replied by emphasizing the reciprocity of the "I" and the "we," the reciprocity of story and theory, the reciprocity of the personal and political. Such reciprocity characterizes the use and valuing of reflexivity in research (Alexander, 2005;Foley, 2002;Turner, 1988).…”
Section: Inventorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…'Queer' can function as an identity category that avoids the medical baggage of 'homosexual', disrupts the masculine bias and domination of 'gay', and avoids the 'ideological liabilities' of the 'lesbian ' and'gay' binary (de Lauretis 1991: v, Anzaldúa 1991). As Sedgwick (1993: 8) argues, queer can also refer to 'the open mesh of possibilities, gaps, overlaps, dissonances and resonances, lapses and excesses of meaning when the constituent elements of anyone's gender, of anyone's sexuality aren't made (or can't be made) to signify monolithically' (see also Corey and Nakayama 1997, Khayatt 2002, Nakayama and Corey 2003.…”
Section: Queer Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…a politics of change, as deployed in queer projects, constitutes much of current autoethnographic work as many autoethnographers intentionally, politically try to make ideological and discursive trouble (Butler 1990a, see Corey and Nakayama 1997, Foster 2008, Jeffries 2002, Johnson 2001, Lee 2003, Nakayama and Corey 2003, Owen 2003, Pelias 1999, Rambo 2007, Taylor 2000.…”
Section: A Politics Of Changementioning
confidence: 99%