2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.cad.2015.04.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Next viewing directions for the scanning of dental impressions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There are several papers describing various methods and techniques for manufacturing dental structures. These include the well-known conventional investment casting technology, and the more recent implementation of milling and SLM technologies that require a scanned virtual model for further processing in the virtual computer environment (Chang et al , 2015). In addition, both milling and additive manufacturing (AM) technologies have already shown promising results for the production of customized and patient-specific implants (Ramakrishnaiah et al , 2016).…”
Section: State-of-the-artmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are several papers describing various methods and techniques for manufacturing dental structures. These include the well-known conventional investment casting technology, and the more recent implementation of milling and SLM technologies that require a scanned virtual model for further processing in the virtual computer environment (Chang et al , 2015). In addition, both milling and additive manufacturing (AM) technologies have already shown promising results for the production of customized and patient-specific implants (Ramakrishnaiah et al , 2016).…”
Section: State-of-the-artmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite their effectiveness in terms of cost reduction and overall improvement of structural performance in engineering systems, these approaches only partially account for uncertainty affecting physical quantities (e.g. materials' mechanical properties) by means of conservative values and/or safety factors [1].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%