2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmg.2022.104468
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Next step in molecular genetics of hereditary breast/ovarian cancer: Multigene panel testing in clinical actionably genes and prioritization algorithms in the study of variants of uncertain significance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0
4

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
4
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Up to 10 non-solved cases gained new insights due to the reevaluation of our prioritized variants. Our variant prioritization approach was also applied for VUS reclassification, a major challenge to unlock the diagnosis of rare pathologies [10,[55][56][57]. Indeed, in our IRD subcohort, top 5 genes with more deleterious variants in IRD solved cases, present a higher degree of uncertainty in variant annotation (proportion of VUS and deleterious variants) in unsolved IRD cases.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Up to 10 non-solved cases gained new insights due to the reevaluation of our prioritized variants. Our variant prioritization approach was also applied for VUS reclassification, a major challenge to unlock the diagnosis of rare pathologies [10,[55][56][57]. Indeed, in our IRD subcohort, top 5 genes with more deleterious variants in IRD solved cases, present a higher degree of uncertainty in variant annotation (proportion of VUS and deleterious variants) in unsolved IRD cases.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The pipeline is based on GATK 4.1 variant caller [26], and uses BWA-MEM aligner [27] to the GRCh37/hg19 reference genome. The following databases were used for annotation: i) allele frequency: gnomAD [17], 1000genomes [28], and Kaviar [29]; ii) pathogenicity prediction: SIFT [30], PolyPhen [31], CADD [32], LRT [33], M-CAP [34], MetaLR [35], MetaSVM [35], MutationAssesor [36], MutationTaster [37], PROVEAN [38], and FATHMM [39]; iii) splicing prediction: ada_score [40] and rf_score [40]; iv) ClinVar [41]; v) conservation: phastCons20way [42] and phyloP20way [43]; vi) gene tolerance to loss of function (LoF) variants: LoFtool [44], and ExACpLI [12]; vii) constrained coding regions by means of gnomAD_CCR [45]; and viii) potential loss of heterozygosity regions, annotated with PLINK [46]. The pipeline is available at https://github.com/TBLabFJD/VariantCallingFJD.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Up to eight non-solved cases gained new insights due to the reevaluation of our prioritized variants. Our variant prioritization approach was also applied for VUS reclassification, a major challenge to unlock the diagnosis of rare pathologies [ 10 , 30 , 31 , 32 ]. Indeed, in our IRD subcohort, the top five genes with more deleterious variants in IRD solved cases present a higher degree of uncertainty in variant annotation (the proportion of VUS and deleterious variants) in unsolved IRD cases.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using this approach, were analyzed 131 variants, consisting of 89 VUS (variant of undetermined value) and 42 unclassified variants (unclassifiable by current methods) within the BRCT repeats, and were able to differentiate them into 78 deleterious and 53 tolerated variants (Sinha et al, 2020). Verónica Castillo-Guardiola (2022) applied an algorithm to prioritize VUS, and out of the 70 VUS, 19 were classified as variants with high-risk of having deleterious effect that needed to be further explored (Castillo-Guardiola et al, 2022). Thus, the ActiveDriverDB tool, own models or algorithms are great alternative approach for genetic variants annotation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%