42nd AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conference &Amp;amp; Exhibit 2006
DOI: 10.2514/6.2006-5180
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

NEXT Multi-Thruster Array Test - Engineering Demonstration

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Electric propulsion thrusters use electric and magnet ¦elds; while operating, they generate high power electromagnetic and thermal radiation. Therefore, there is a danger of negative thrusters interference though Hall-and ion-based clusters tests have shown [28,3133] that negative interference can be successfully minimized or even entirely eliminated.…”
Section: Figure 5 Independent (A) and Common (B) Eps Architecturesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Electric propulsion thrusters use electric and magnet ¦elds; while operating, they generate high power electromagnetic and thermal radiation. Therefore, there is a danger of negative thrusters interference though Hall-and ion-based clusters tests have shown [28,3133] that negative interference can be successfully minimized or even entirely eliminated.…”
Section: Figure 5 Independent (A) and Common (B) Eps Architecturesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This MTAT utilized multiple engineering model (EM) NEXT ion thrusters as well as laboratory power consoles and laboratory propellant feed systems to operate multiple thrusters simultaneously. The engineering demonstration portion of MTAT [21] focused on the characterization of performance and behavior of the individual thrusters and the array as affected by the simultaneous operation of multiple ion thrusters. The MTAT physics effort focused on the characterization of the plasma environment generated by the simultaneous operation of multiple ion thrusters.…”
Section: Recent Progressmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The primary components of the test included: four EM thrusters mounted on a reconfigurable array, one of which was an instrumented non-operational unit, a gimbal simulator articulating one thruster, laboratory power supplies, laboratory xenon feed systems, extensive plume and plasma diagnostics, and a data acquisition and control system. Test objectives and sequences concentrated on engineering evaluation of thruster operations [29], plume characterization and interactions, with variation in thruster spacing and gimbaling effects considered [30], [31], neutralizer performance in multi-thruster arrays [32], and plasma environments around the thruster array and at the spacecraft interfaces [33].…”
Section: Multi-thrustermentioning
confidence: 99%