2010
DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btq216
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Next-generation VariationHunter: combinatorial algorithms for transposon insertion discovery

Abstract: Recent years have witnessed an increase in research activity for the detection of structural variants (SVs) and their association to human disease. The advent of next-generation sequencing technologies make it possible to extend the scope of structural variation studies to a point previously unimaginable as exemplified by the 1000 Genomes Project. Although various computational methods have been described for the detection of SVs, no such algorithm is yet fully capable of discovering transposon insertions, a v… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
155
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 191 publications
(155 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
155
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, with the advent of next-generation sequencing, the cost of sequencing has dropped precipitously, and now it is feasible to study RDV in detail for large sample populations. Many methods have been developed to discover CNVs using sequencing data (Chen et al 2009;Korbel et al 2009;Lee et al 2009;Sindi et al 2009;Wang et al 2009;Ye et al 2009;Hajirasouliha et al 2010;Hormozdiari et al 2010;Handsaker et al 2011;Zhang et al 2011), but only a few attempted to analyze RDVs (Conrad et al 2009;Karakoc et al 2011;Schrider et al 2011Schrider et al , 2013Ewing et al 2013).…”
Section: Methods Predicting Novel Retroduplicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, with the advent of next-generation sequencing, the cost of sequencing has dropped precipitously, and now it is feasible to study RDV in detail for large sample populations. Many methods have been developed to discover CNVs using sequencing data (Chen et al 2009;Korbel et al 2009;Lee et al 2009;Sindi et al 2009;Wang et al 2009;Ye et al 2009;Hajirasouliha et al 2010;Hormozdiari et al 2010;Handsaker et al 2011;Zhang et al 2011), but only a few attempted to analyze RDVs (Conrad et al 2009;Karakoc et al 2011;Schrider et al 2011Schrider et al , 2013Ewing et al 2013).…”
Section: Methods Predicting Novel Retroduplicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite some successes, existing bioinformatics tools such as BreakDancer ), VariationHunter (Hormozdiari et al 2010), CREST (Wang et al 2011), and PRISM (Jiang et al 2012) are hindered by intra-tumor heterogeneity, alignment to repetitive genomic sequences, technical artifacts (i.e., library preparation), poor coverage, and a large number of false-positive calls owing to sequencing errors. The failure to predict some SVs using WGS data would therefore result in the corresponding gene fusion product being missed.…”
Section: [Supplemental Materials Is Available For This Article]mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Prediction methods for structural variants (SVs) have been developed to annotate diverged regions on the basis of pairedend sequencing (6)(7)(8)(9)(10)(11)(12)(13)(14)(15)(16). Unfortunately, these predictions do not include the actual sequence of the variants, and they often miss larger rearrangements, complex changes, and small insertion/ deletions (indels).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%