2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.tifs.2018.02.021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Next-generation therapies for celiac disease: The gluten-targeted approaches

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
41
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 129 publications
0
41
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Our own research and parallel studies performed elsewhere clearly showed that it is possible to obtain ‘reduced-gluten wheat genotypes/varieties’ (Wen et al 2012; also cf. Ribeiro et al 2018). These lines are neither fully depleted of gluten nor do they completely lack the well-known highly immunogenic gluten peptides, except the recently developed wheat lines that lack highly immunogenic 33-mer gliadin peptide (Sánchez-León et al 2018).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Our own research and parallel studies performed elsewhere clearly showed that it is possible to obtain ‘reduced-gluten wheat genotypes/varieties’ (Wen et al 2012; also cf. Ribeiro et al 2018). These lines are neither fully depleted of gluten nor do they completely lack the well-known highly immunogenic gluten peptides, except the recently developed wheat lines that lack highly immunogenic 33-mer gliadin peptide (Sánchez-León et al 2018).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, previously established lines still contained higher molecular weight (HMW) glutenins, which are indispensable for baking and were thus far supposed to be largely non-immunogenic. However, there is a small proportion of celiac patients who showed sensitivity to HMW glutenins and could not consume wheat genotypes containing these proteins (Barro et al 2016; Ribeiro et al 2018). …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More extensive studies were carried out by Barro and coworkers (Table 2). This work has been reviewed in detail (García-Molina, Giménez, Sánchez-León, & Barro, 2019;Gilissen et al, 2014;Jouanin, Boyd, Visser, & Smulders, 2018;Ribeiro et al, 2018;Rosella et al, 2014;Shewry & Tatham, 2016) and is therefore discussed only briefly here. In summary, they generated two series of lines, with downregulation of only γ -gliadins (Gil-Humanes et al, 2008;Piston, Gil-Humanes, Rodríguez-Quijano, & Barro, 2011) or all gliadins (α/β-, γ -, and ω-) and LMW subunits (Gil-Humanes, Piston, Shewry, Tosi, & Barro, 2011;Gil-Humanes, Piston, Tollefsen, Sollid, & Barro, 2010).…”
Section: Use Of Genetic Modification To Develop Coeliac-safe Wheat Gementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, several strategies have been developed in order to detoxify the gluten and make it potentially safe for celiac patients such as the degradation of immunodominant peptides by specific proteases, the development of genetically modified low‐gliadin wheat lines and the previous transamidation of glutamine residues present in gluten proteins in order to hamper its deamidation by human tissue transglutaminase . However, in general these strategies result in a decrease in gluten functionality and in particular for the genetically modified low‐gliadin wheat lines there are still doubts associated with dealing with genetically modified organisms …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%