Next Generation Smart Built Environments: The Fusion of Empathy, Privacy and Ethics

Gračanin, Denis; Lasisi, Ramoni O.; Azab, Mohamed; Eltoweissy, Mohamed

doi:10.1109/tps-isa48467.2019.00041

Cited by 6 publications

(6 citation statements)

References 39 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Design thinking was considered appropriated by the authors to support the elicitation of privacy requirements, since the empathy phase made it easier to discover and understand the concerns, problems and real experiences of the stakeholders. Gračanin et al [25] proposed a unified framework that incorporates a game theoretic model to address empathy, privacy and ethics (EPE) interplay in Smart Built Environments (SBEs). The authors say that the use of Empathy in software development activities leads developers to create products that can improve human well-being.…”

Section: Slr Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Empathy and Criativity in Privacy Requirements Elicitation: Systematic Literature Review

Calazans,

Cerqueira,

Canedo

2020

Anais Do Workshop Em Engenharia De Requisitos

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This paper presents a Systematic Literature Review (SLR) in order to find in the literature papers that use creativity and empathy techniques in privacy requirements elicitation. These techniques have been used in requirements elicitation in order to facilitate the understanding of the requirements and provide a collaborative interaction between the teams and the end user. Thus, we investigated whether the literature already has reports on the use of these techniques as facilitators in the process of privacy requirements elicitation. As a result of the SLR, we found few papers related to the use of Empathy in privacy requirements elicitation and no papers that relate Creativity to the elicitation of privacy requirements.

show abstract

Section: Slr Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Empathy and Criativity in Privacy Requirements Elicitation: Systematic Literature Review

Calazans,

Cerqueira,

Canedo

2020

Anais Do Workshop Em Engenharia De Requisitos

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Most of the time, the objective is to instill trust in the user and be empathetic to augment the relevant involvement in the deployed IoT applications. These design objectives may however contrast with each other, as analyzed in Gracanin et al (2019), where empathy, privacy and ethics are considered all together in the design of the user-IoT-interaction modalities; for instance, what is a privacy-preserving action may not be appropriate from the emphatic point of view. The user interface should also stimulate the user towards collaborating with the other entities involved in the IoT applications; towards this objective appropriate incentives to the users are introduced, which need to be personalized to avoid poor behavior and preserve privacy (Dustdar and Scekic 2018).…”

Section: Outcomes and Mechanismsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…These processes should be humanity-based from the start, include regular consultations with multiple stakeholders and robust transparency reporting on activities that may have an adverse impact on human rights (Winter 2015). Finally, future IoT environments need to facilitate massive user involvement, in multiple environments, with new contexts (Gracanin et al 2019). This may include recommendations for technical design frameworks where multiple stakeholder interests are balanced with system monitoring, and the design is governed throughout the development process.…”

Section: Diverse User Involvement Throughout the Design Processmentioning

confidence: 99%

Review of the theory, principles, and design requirements of human-centric Internet of Things (IoT)

Ystgaard¹,

Atzori

Palma³

et al. 2023

J Ambient Intell Human Comput

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The rapid evolution of Internet of Things (IoT) technologies, with ever more profound implications for humans and societies, has triggered visions and initiatives to re-align the Next-Generation IoT with what works for humans and humanity first. However, despite the increased push towards “human-centric” IoT, it is still poorly understood what “human-centric” actually means in this context, how it is interpreted and embedded into the design, by whom, and for which purposes. To address these questions, we conducted a systematic literature review (N = 84) on the theory, principles, and design requirements of human-centric IoT. A key observation is that, despite the recent increase in research on humane perspectives for IoT, “human-centredness” often still seems to be used primarily as a label and overarching paradigm, not leading to a profound change in the underlying practices. We found no shared understanding of what “human-centric” implies in this context or common agreement on which principles human-centric IoT should be built upon. Furthermore, our analysis confirmed the predominance of technology-oriented fields, with a traditional approach towards user involvement and limited involvement of other disciplines. Overall, our findings point towards an apparent discrepancy between how contributions are positioned and framed (“human-centric”), the practices and assumptions they are based on, and their actual impact and ability to orient existing efforts towards genuine human-centric outcomes and key values. Based on the results, we formulate directions for future research aimed at building a more human-centric and empowering IoT.

show abstract

“…Integrating Blockchain with the IoT. [15], [16], [104], [105], [106], [107], [108] •Focus only on single blockchainbased network.…”

Section: E Blockchain-based Approachesmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…To support data integrity in a Smart Building Environment (SBE), Denis et al [106] implement a game-theoretic model-based framework that is integrated with a blockchain infrastructure. The framework consists of data from both physical and digital worlds to understand users' cognitive and emotional states.…”

Section: E Blockchain-based Approachesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Privacy in the Internet of Things: Where do We Stand? A Systematic Literature Review

Gupta¹,

Ghanavati²

2022

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Next Generation Smart Built Environments: The Fusion of Empathy, Privacy and Ethics

Cited by 6 publications

References 39 publications

Empathy and Criativity in Privacy Requirements Elicitation: Systematic Literature Review

Empathy and Criativity in Privacy Requirements Elicitation: Systematic Literature Review

Review of the theory, principles, and design requirements of human-centric Internet of Things (IoT)

Privacy in the Internet of Things: Where do We Stand? A Systematic Literature Review

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About