2016
DOI: 10.1038/bcj.2016.51
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Next-generation sequencing with a myeloid gene panel in core-binding factor AML showed KIT activation loop and TET2 mutations predictive of outcome

Abstract: Clinical outcome and mutations of 96 core-binding factor acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients 18–60 years old were examined. Complete remission (CR) after induction was 94.6%. There was no significant difference in CR, leukemia-free-survival (LFS) and overall survival (OS) between t(8;21) (N=67) and inv(16) patients (N=29). Univariate analysis showed hematopoietic stem cell transplantation at CR1 as the only clinical parameter associated with superior LFS. Next-generation sequencing based on a myeloid gene pa… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
24
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
3
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These recurrent mutations likely represent other pathways that are relevant for RUNX1/RUNX1T1-initiated leukemogenesis. Of note, most of these mutations have been associated with unfavorable prognosis in AML in recent studies [14,16,17,[35][36][37][38]. In our RUNX1/RUNX1T1 cohort, aberrations in DHX15 and SMC1A were found to be strong and independent adverse prognostic factors for OS and RFS.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 52%
“…These recurrent mutations likely represent other pathways that are relevant for RUNX1/RUNX1T1-initiated leukemogenesis. Of note, most of these mutations have been associated with unfavorable prognosis in AML in recent studies [14,16,17,[35][36][37][38]. In our RUNX1/RUNX1T1 cohort, aberrations in DHX15 and SMC1A were found to be strong and independent adverse prognostic factors for OS and RFS.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 52%
“…As a discovery cohort, INDELseek was applied to an additional MN panel dataset of 10 core-binding factor leukemia samples that were clinically predicted to be enriched for somatic mutations of KIT exon 8 [17]. A total of 10 KIT in-frame complex indels were detected from six of the samples (1 – 4 complex indels per sample; Table 2) and verified by orthogonal validation experiments (Additional file 2: Figure S9-S14).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ten core-binding factor leukemia DNA samples were retrieved from Queen Mary Hospital, Hong Kong from January 2003 to December 2014 as a discovery cohort of KIT exon 8 mutations. A total of 32 DNA samples were screened by MiSeq sequencing of a 54-gene myeloid NGS gene panel as described [16, 17]. Complex indel detection by INDELseek was performed on BWA-MEM (version 0.7.7) alignments of MiSeq NGS data of CALR, JAK2 and KIT (exon 8 only).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 However, several prognostic factors, including genetic alterations, have been demonstrated. [2][3][4][5][6][7][8] In particular, KIT mutation has been suggested to be associated with a poor prognosis in AML patients with RUNX1-RUNX1T1 or CBFB-MYH11. 3,5,[9][10][11][12] Many types of KIT mutations have been identified in cancer cells, but there are 3 mutation hot-spots (exon 8, exon 10-11, and exon 17) in AML.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%