2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2019.10.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Next generation sequencing of lung adenocarcinoma subtypes with intestinal differentiation reveals distinct molecular signatures associated with histomorphology and therapeutic options

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
19
1
2

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
1
19
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…On the other hand, both the frequent alteration of MMR and the high TMB reported in the literature, as well as the expression of immune checkpoint regulators, may suggest a potential sensitiveness of PAED to immunotherapy (Ref. 33), whose introduction in the clinical practice may significantly improve the outcome of such malignancies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…On the other hand, both the frequent alteration of MMR and the high TMB reported in the literature, as well as the expression of immune checkpoint regulators, may suggest a potential sensitiveness of PAED to immunotherapy (Ref. 33), whose introduction in the clinical practice may significantly improve the outcome of such malignancies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More recently, Jurmeister et al confirmed for the first time the potential eligibility for treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors in PAED patients, according to the validated presence of a high TMB but also of the membranous PD-L1 staining positivity in the tumour cells of PAED (Ref. 33). Furthermore, the same authors, based on the identification of the amplification of the RICTOR gene in PAED samples, suggested a potential therapeutic approach with mTORC1/2 inhibitors in these patients (Ref.…”
Section: Pathogenesis and Clinical Featuresmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Recent research studies have proved that KRAS mutation was the most frequent oncogenic driver mutations in IMA (63–90%) followed by NRG1 fusions (7–27%) ( 8 11 ). Compared with non-mucinous adenocarcinoma (non-IMA), IMA has a lower rate of EGFR mutations (only 0–5%) and a higher rate of ALK rearrangements (2.2%) and ERBB2 mutations (1.2%) ( 6 , 12 , 13 ). In addition, rare gene mutations, such as HER2, BRAF, and PI3KA mutations, and rare gene fusions, such as TRIM4-BRAF, VAMP2-NRG1, and CD74-NRG1fusions, were observed in IMA patients with KRAS-negative ( 8 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%