2022
DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.939969
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Next-Generation Sequencing Analysis of Gastric Cancer Identifies the Leukemia Inhibitory Factor Receptor as a Driving Factor in Gastric Cancer Progression and as a Predictor of Poor Prognosis

Abstract: Gastric cancer (GC) is the third cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide. Nevertheless, because GC screening programs are not cost-effective, most patients receive diagnosis in the advanced stages, when surgical options are limited. Peritoneal dissemination occurs in approximately one-third of patients with GC at the diagnosis and is a strong predictor of poor outcome. Despite the clinical relevance, biological and molecular mechanisms underlying the development of peritoneal metastasis in GC remain poorly… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
16
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
(64 reference statements)
1
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, despite this difference, both cell lines exhibit a concentration-dependent proliferation when challenged with LIF (5, 10, 25, 50, and 100 ng/mL); however, while the MIA PaCa-2 cells showed a biphasic response ( Figure 2 D), PANC1 cells exhibited a linear progression of cell proliferation (measured by the MTS assay) in response to increasing concentrations of LIF ( Figure 2 E). The fact that exposure of MIA PaCa-2 cells to higher concentrations of LIF (25, 50, and 100 ng/mL) promoted a reduction of cell vitality is consistent with the finding that, in some systems, this cytokine exerts direct cytotoxic effects ( Figure 2 D) as reported by us and others in gastric cancer cell lines [ 16 , 42 ]. Because the effects exerted by low concentrations of LIF (5–10 ng/mL) were similar in the two cell lines, we used MIA PaCA-2 for the following experiments.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…However, despite this difference, both cell lines exhibit a concentration-dependent proliferation when challenged with LIF (5, 10, 25, 50, and 100 ng/mL); however, while the MIA PaCa-2 cells showed a biphasic response ( Figure 2 D), PANC1 cells exhibited a linear progression of cell proliferation (measured by the MTS assay) in response to increasing concentrations of LIF ( Figure 2 E). The fact that exposure of MIA PaCa-2 cells to higher concentrations of LIF (25, 50, and 100 ng/mL) promoted a reduction of cell vitality is consistent with the finding that, in some systems, this cytokine exerts direct cytotoxic effects ( Figure 2 D) as reported by us and others in gastric cancer cell lines [ 16 , 42 ]. Because the effects exerted by low concentrations of LIF (5–10 ng/mL) were similar in the two cell lines, we used MIA PaCA-2 for the following experiments.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…The cell viability assay was done using the CellTiter 96 Aqueous One Solution Cell Proliferation Assay (Promega, Milano, Italy), a colorimetric method for accessing the number of viable cells in proliferation, as described previously [ 16 ]. MIA-PaCa 2 and PANC-1 cells were seeded in DMEM complete medium at 36 × 10 3 cells/100 μLl well into a 96-well tissue culture plate.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The cell viability assay was done using the CellTiter 96 Aqueous One Solution Cell Proliferation Assay (Promega, Milano, Italy), a colorimetric method for accessing the number of viable cells in proliferation as described previously ( 13 ). MIA-PaCa 2 cells were seeded in DMEM complete medium at 36 *10 3 cells/100 uL well into 96-well tissue culture plate.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Upon binding to its ligands, LIFR undergoes a series of conformational rearrangements that promote the phosphorylation of the Jak-Tyk, two proteins that are constitutively associated to cytoplasmic domain of the gp130/LIFR complex ( 11 ), activating the downstream signalling pathways which include JAK1/STAT3, MAPK and AKT. The LIF/LIFR axis and JAK/STAT3 signalling pathway is over-regulated in several type of solid tumours, including PDAC ( 12 ), gastric cancer (GC) ( 13 ), hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) ( 14 ), colon-rectal cancer (CRC) ( 15 ) and breast cancer ( 16 ), and promotes cancer cell proliferation, epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT) ( 17 ) and regulates aberrantly the self-renewal of cancer cell-initiating tumors ( 18 ), as well as promoting radio ( 19 ) and chemo-resistance ( 15 ). Several studies support the suppression of LIFR signalling as potential target in inhibiting cell growth and tumour progression ( 9 ), and we have shown recently, that LIFR-mediated antagonism supports the anti-oncogenic effect of mifepristone in pancreatic cancer and chemoresistance ( 20 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%