2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.schres.2012.10.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Next-generation negative symptom assessment for clinical trials: Validation of the Brief Negative Symptom Scale

Abstract: The current study examined the psychometric properties of the Brief Negative Symptom Scale (BNSS), a next-generation rating instrument developed in response to the NIMH sponsored consensus development conference on negative symptoms. Participants included 100 individuals with a DSM-IV diagnosis of schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder who completed a clinical interview designed to assess negative, positive, disorganized, and general psychiatric symptoms, as well as functional outcome. A battery of anhedoni… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

5
105
2

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 163 publications
(114 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
5
105
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Its convergent validity was good as demonstrated by the correlation coefficients between the BNSS total score and the SANS total, BPRS negative and PANSS negative subscale scores (0.84, 0.68 and 0.80, respectively) [3,35]. With regard to the discriminant validity, as expected, there was no statistically significant correlation with the BPRS positive score (r = −0.06) nor with the PANSS positive subscale score (r = 0.09) or with the cognitive function as measured by the WASI (r = −0.13), while the scale showed moderate correlation with the PANSS general psychopathology score (r = 0.4) [3,35].…”
Section: The Brief Negative Symptom Scale (Bnss)mentioning
confidence: 98%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Its convergent validity was good as demonstrated by the correlation coefficients between the BNSS total score and the SANS total, BPRS negative and PANSS negative subscale scores (0.84, 0.68 and 0.80, respectively) [3,35]. With regard to the discriminant validity, as expected, there was no statistically significant correlation with the BPRS positive score (r = −0.06) nor with the PANSS positive subscale score (r = 0.09) or with the cognitive function as measured by the WASI (r = −0.13), while the scale showed moderate correlation with the PANSS general psychopathology score (r = 0.4) [3,35].…”
Section: The Brief Negative Symptom Scale (Bnss)mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In addition for two negative symptoms-avolition and asociality-the BNSS differentiates between internal experiences and behaviours [35]. Although this distinction may help to clarify and assess the true nature of the negative symptoms, i.e.…”
Section: The Brief Negative Symptom Scale (Bnss)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Further, current "gold standard" methods of evaluating motivational deficits rely on clinical ratings usually based on patient self-report (Strauss et al, 2012;Kring et al, 2013). Recently, several studies have employed performance-based tasks to objectively demonstrate effortrelated motivational deficits in patients with schizophrenia (Fervaha et al, 2013c;Gold et al, 2013;Barch et al, 2014;Wolf et al, 2014;Docx et al, 2015;Hartmann et al, 2015;Treadway et al, 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The severity of negative symptoms has been reported to correlate with neurocognitive impairment crosssectionally with weak to moderate effect sizes (Addington et al, 1991;Strauss et al, 2012b). However, there is still a debate about the nature of their relationship (Harvey et al, 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%