2020
DOI: 10.1021/acscentsci.0c00749
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Next-Generation Liquid Metal Batteries Based on the Chemistry of Fusible Alloys

Abstract: With a long cycle life, high rate capability, and facile cell fabrication, liquid metal batteries are regarded as a promising energy storage technology to achieve better utilization of intermittent renewable energy sources. Nevertheless, conventional liquid metal batteries need to be operated at relatively high temperatures (>240 °C) to maintain molten-state electrodes and high conductivity of electrolytes. Intermediate and room-temperature liquid metal batteries, circumventing complex thermal management as we… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
51
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 77 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 79 publications
1
51
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[29] In the previous reports by Yu's group, comprehensively summarized tables of some commonly recognized fusible alloy systems that could possibly be used in batteries have been presented, with the melting temperature, reaction potentials, price, and safety hazards. [22,23] In Figure 2a, we present a summarization of the melting temperatures and estimated range of alloy melting temperatures by elements, versus the abundance of elements in the Earth's crust, labeled with the reduction potential, for an intuitive comparison. [4,[30][31][32] It could be clearly told that among these groups of fusible alloys, the alkali metal alloys obtain the lowest melting temperatures and reduction potentials, while the element abundance of them is the highest.…”
Section: Fusible Alloys and Phase Transformation In Electrochemical Processmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[29] In the previous reports by Yu's group, comprehensively summarized tables of some commonly recognized fusible alloy systems that could possibly be used in batteries have been presented, with the melting temperature, reaction potentials, price, and safety hazards. [22,23] In Figure 2a, we present a summarization of the melting temperatures and estimated range of alloy melting temperatures by elements, versus the abundance of elements in the Earth's crust, labeled with the reduction potential, for an intuitive comparison. [4,[30][31][32] It could be clearly told that among these groups of fusible alloys, the alkali metal alloys obtain the lowest melting temperatures and reduction potentials, while the element abundance of them is the highest.…”
Section: Fusible Alloys and Phase Transformation In Electrochemical Processmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, researchers reported the application of fusible alloys as a group of metal alloys maintaining liquid state near room-temperature, including alkali metals such as Na-K, Na-Cs alloys, and post-transition metals such as Ga-In, Ga-Sn alloys. [22][23][24] The adoption of room-temperature liquid metals in batteries has brought a bright new insight for the research works aiming to solve the interfacial issues of Li metal anodes. As summarized in Figure 1, in general, a dendrite-free liquid metal electrode based on fusible alloys could achieve higher energy and power density than insertion-based electrode materials.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the Bi–Pb–Sn-based liquid metal battery is promising for the next-generation energy technologies provided the health issue related to Pb should be taken into consideration. 49 What’s more, given the lower cost of Pb and Sn than Bi, the demonstrated liquid metal battery based on Bi–Pb–Sn vs Na is also more cost-effective than the Na–Bi and Li–Bi systems in reported works. 16 …”
mentioning
confidence: 88%
“…[ 88 ] Therefore, future work must be done to investigate how to translate liquid metal circuitry fabrication methods to large‐scale manufacturing processes that are both practical and cost‐effective. As liquid metal is significantly more expensive than conventional alternatives, [ 171 ] it is impractical for use if manufacturing processes require excessive amounts. For example, the expense of large amounts of liquid metal limits potential usage in cooling mechanisms for thermal management operation schemes.…”
Section: Challengesmentioning
confidence: 99%