The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2009
DOI: 10.5483/bmbrep.2009.42.6.315
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Next-generation gene targeting in the mouse for functional genomics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In our study, mutator mice bred for 20 generations gave rise to 6335 SNVs (the sum of the numbers of heterozygous and homozygous variants). This is much higher than the estimated number of mutations induced by ENU treatment (2105 SNVs) (Gondo et al 2009) or the number of de novo SNVs predicted to distinguish the original C57 mouse stock (Russell 1978) from the C57BL/6J strain currently distributed by Jackson Laboratory (3292 SNVs, calculated using our estimated mutation rate and the known generation number, F226). Considering that our comparison of the variant data between the mutC/mutD lines and the mutE line indicated that the frequency of recurrent mutations in the mutator mice was low (details in Supplemental Information), the long-term breeding of mutator mice is a promising method for enhancing mutagenesis across the entire genome.…”
mentioning
confidence: 66%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In our study, mutator mice bred for 20 generations gave rise to 6335 SNVs (the sum of the numbers of heterozygous and homozygous variants). This is much higher than the estimated number of mutations induced by ENU treatment (2105 SNVs) (Gondo et al 2009) or the number of de novo SNVs predicted to distinguish the original C57 mouse stock (Russell 1978) from the C57BL/6J strain currently distributed by Jackson Laboratory (3292 SNVs, calculated using our estimated mutation rate and the known generation number, F226). Considering that our comparison of the variant data between the mutC/mutD lines and the mutE line indicated that the frequency of recurrent mutations in the mutator mice was low (details in Supplemental Information), the long-term breeding of mutator mice is a promising method for enhancing mutagenesis across the entire genome.…”
mentioning
confidence: 66%
“…) of wild-type mice and the known rate (8.0 × 10 −7 ) of mice treated with the widely used chemical mu- Table 2; Keays et al 2006;Gondo et al 2009). …”
Section: Germline Mutation Rates In Micementioning
confidence: 99%
“…43,44 Currently, there are at least 20 ENU consortiums around the world. 45 Such programs have revealed many critical genes for human diseases, including male infertility. [46][47][48][49] …”
Section: Mouse Models In Male Fertility Research D Jamsai and Mk O'brmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the in vitro models have helped us to understand molecular pathways of cancer, they don't model adequately the spontaneous human tumours because of limitations like selective transformation with a selection of certain gene sets, morphologic characters, and functions (MacLeod et al, 1999;Masters, 2002). The mouse has been the most frequent model for genetic studies in mammals with advantages like small size, average lifespan of about 2 years, short gestation period and inexpensiveness in contrast to other mammals but it has got significant limitations when used to study complex human diseases (Paigen, 1995;Strauch et al, 2003;Gondo et al, 2009;Seok et al, 2013). There are genetic, immunological and cellular differences between human and mice which make it a poor model for cancer study (Schuh, 2004).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%