2021
DOI: 10.3390/ijms22147470
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Next-Generation Biomarkers in Multiple Myeloma: Understanding the Molecular Basis for Potential Use in Diagnosis and Prognosis

Abstract: Multiple myeloma (MM) is considered to be the second most common blood malignancy and it is characterized by abnormal proliferation and an accumulation of malignant plasma cells in the bone marrow. Although the currently utilized markers in the diagnosis and assessment of MM are showing promising results, the incidence and mortality rate of the disease are still high. Therefore, exploring and developing better diagnostic or prognostic biomarkers have drawn global interest. In the present review, we highlight s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 175 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The inclusion criteria were as follows: (1) All of the MM patients meet the diagnostic criteria of the International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG); (2) All patients were newly diagnosed MM at the time of inclusion; (3) whole-body diffusion-weighted imaging (WB-DWI) was performed before treatment; (4) The interval between initial chemotherapy and WB-DWI was within 1 week; (5) All the patients enrolled were symptomatic or active MM with detectable M protein in blood or urine; (6) All the patients received at least four courses of firstline treatment based on bortezomib, and the treatment response was evaluated; (7) All patients received regular (every 3 months) inpatient services, outpatient services, and telephone follow-up.…”
Section: Patientsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The inclusion criteria were as follows: (1) All of the MM patients meet the diagnostic criteria of the International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG); (2) All patients were newly diagnosed MM at the time of inclusion; (3) whole-body diffusion-weighted imaging (WB-DWI) was performed before treatment; (4) The interval between initial chemotherapy and WB-DWI was within 1 week; (5) All the patients enrolled were symptomatic or active MM with detectable M protein in blood or urine; (6) All the patients received at least four courses of firstline treatment based on bortezomib, and the treatment response was evaluated; (7) All patients received regular (every 3 months) inpatient services, outpatient services, and telephone follow-up.…”
Section: Patientsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The overall survival (OS) of MM patients was 30 months. Thalidomide treatment could prolong the OS to 46 months and bone marrow transplantation to 48 months (7). Although with the change of treatment methods the 5-year survival rate of MM has increased from 28% to 56% (1975 to 2012) (5), the imaging methods that can effectively predict the prognosis of the disease still need to be explored.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 20 , 26 In recent years, NGS technology, which involves whole-exome sequencing, has been used to identify the genomic mutation landscape and clonal heterogeneity in MM. 27 29 There is an MM-specific gene panel for targeting NGS sequencing (M 3 P v3.0) that includes 88 frequently mutated genes and drug-related genes. 30 Although the genomic complexity of MM disease has been extensively studied in Western countries, data on Southeast Asian populations are still lacking.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At this point, the clinical and laboratory criteria utilized for building the score systems above cannot comprehensively capture the molecular and biological indicators underlying the resistance machinery of new treatments and, ultimately, the PFS and OS magnitude. In this respect, the use of different analytical methods to establish a comprehensive prognostic scoring system, including gene expression/mutation-derived risk scores and clinical prognostic signatures, is desirable to improve predictive precision and guide future clinical therapy ( 46 , 47 ). Nevertheless, next-generation markers are far from their systematic utilization in RRMM real-world patients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%