2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijepes.2012.10.038
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Newton–Raphson power flow with constant matrices: A comparison with decoupled power flow methods

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although the authors show that advantages can be expected from this approach, the numerical tests shown in the paper concern only small size networks. In [9], the coupling Pδ-QV is exploited in the conventional Newton-Raphson power flow together with the use of constant matrices in the iterative scheme. The numerical results obtained through this approach exhibit better performance (in terms of number of iterations) than the conventional decoupled methods (XB and BX).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the authors show that advantages can be expected from this approach, the numerical tests shown in the paper concern only small size networks. In [9], the coupling Pδ-QV is exploited in the conventional Newton-Raphson power flow together with the use of constant matrices in the iterative scheme. The numerical results obtained through this approach exhibit better performance (in terms of number of iterations) than the conventional decoupled methods (XB and BX).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The power flow program in an AC power system can be modeled by a set of nonlinear equations and solved by numerical iterative methods. The well‐known solution approaches are the Gauss–Seidel , Newton–Raphson , fast decoupled methods , and new, efficient iterative techniques . However, in practical large‐scale power systems consisting of thousands of buses, the standard Newton–Raphson method has a slow execution time, because of the need for recalculation of a large Jacobian matrix in each iteration.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%