2020
DOI: 10.1188/20.cjon.e21-e27
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

NEWS Scoring System: Use in Hematologic Malignancies and Cellular Therapeutics Patient Populations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Tindakan pemberian skor dan pembacaan skor pada EWS digunakan sebagai bagian dari keputusan klinis yang berfungsi sebagai indikator ketajaman pada frekuensi pemantauan dan alokasi sumber daya. Eskalasi numerik pada EWS berperan disaat pengambilan intervensi dalam pengaktifkan panggilan MET segera jika diperlukan seperti pada skor EWS > 7dan memiliki setidaknya satu kriteria tambahan (Suhr et al, 2020).…”
Section: Pemantauan Disertai Manajemen Tindakanunclassified
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Tindakan pemberian skor dan pembacaan skor pada EWS digunakan sebagai bagian dari keputusan klinis yang berfungsi sebagai indikator ketajaman pada frekuensi pemantauan dan alokasi sumber daya. Eskalasi numerik pada EWS berperan disaat pengambilan intervensi dalam pengaktifkan panggilan MET segera jika diperlukan seperti pada skor EWS > 7dan memiliki setidaknya satu kriteria tambahan (Suhr et al, 2020).…”
Section: Pemantauan Disertai Manajemen Tindakanunclassified
“…Penggunaan SBAR memfasilitasi percakapan interprofesional dan menghindarkan kesalahan penerimaan informasi. Penggunaan SBAR memudahkan perawat untuk memulai percakapan tentang agresivitas penatalaksanaan dan pengobatan pada pasien (Suhr et al, 2020).…”
Section: Pemantauan Disertai Manajemen Tindakanunclassified
“…As such, the authors did not measure changes in clinical outcomes as a result of implementing MEWS in the emergency department. 26 Lind et al 23 Lee et al 27 Cooksley et al 16 Young et al 17 Aygun et al 28 Although several studies mentioned above have used variations of MEWS to predict morbidity and mortality in the oncology population, Suhr et al 29 studied the effect of the NEWS scoring system in the hematologic malignancy and cellular therapeutics population at the University of Kansas Health Systems, including patients admitted for allogenic or autologous transplantation, other treatment (eg, chemotherapy), or post-transplantation readmission. In the preimplementation period, the authors performed a retrospective chart review on patients who had RRT activation using the pre-existing SIRS criteria.…”
Section: Experience With Early Warning Scores In Oncologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The studies that have assessed the effect of these tools in inpatients with malignancy have used various scoring systems with different parameters and have evaluated different outcomes with no clear standardization. 16,17,23,[26][27][28][29] Furthermore, the studies only looked at absolute cutoff values for their scoring systems without assessing the predictive ability of dynamic changes in contiguous scores over time. The majority of studies were limited by their small sample size, single-institution focus, and retrospective nature.…”
Section: Implementation Considerations For Inpatient Oncology Settingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Vital sign-based early warning scores (EWSs) were developed and adopted for screening patients at high risk of clinical deterioration [10,11,18,23]. However, vital sign-based EWSs, already widely used in many hospitals for activating the RRS, were found to have poor discriminatory power for identifying cancer patients at risk of deterioration [24,25]. Additionally, some studies have expressed concerns about applying conventional scoring systems to cancer patients, as these track and trigger scores may not reflect the diverse patterns and rapid deterioration of these patients.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%