We read with great interest the review article "News in Pathophysiology, Definition, and Classification of Hepatorenal Syndrome: a step beyond the International Club of Ascites (ICA) Consensus document" by Angeli et al. published recently in Journal of Hepatology. 1 The review discusses a number of important issues related to acute kidney injury (AKI) in cirrhosis and proposes modifications to the definition, classification, pathogenesis, and management of hepatorenal syndrome (HRS). HRS is a specific type of kidney impairment unique to patients with cirrhosis characterized by a sudden and severe impairment in kidney function in the absence of significant histological abnormalities in the kidneys. 2 Specifically, we would like to comment on 2 aspects of this review, terminology and pathogenesis of HRS. First, the authors of the review article recommend using the term HRS-AKI instead of type-1 HRS to define the acute type of HRS and to differentiate it from the chronic type, previously known as type-2 HRS. 3 This proposal is very reasonable from a clinical perspective in the setting of the current use of AKI terminology and will be helpful to avoid confusion between the acute and chronic forms of HRS. Second, the authors challenge the concept of functional impairment as the pathophysiological mechanism of HRS and propose a role for necrosis of tubular cells as part of the pathogenesis of HRS. 1 In fact, it is proposed that rather than 2 distinct entities, HRS and acute tubular necrosis (ATN) should be considered a continuum. Thus, as suggested in the review, if HRS-AKI is maintained for a sufficient period of time, ATN may develop, which in the authors' opinion explains the lack of response to vasoconstrictors in some patients with HRS-AKI. Such a conclusion would suggest that all patients with prolonged HRS likely need a simultaneous kidney and liver transplant, and not liver transplant alone. Although the hypothesis of HRS-ATN as a continuum is attractive, no new data is presented to support it. This new pathogenic proposal appears to be based on the study by Trawalé et al. in which substantial abnormalities in kidney biopsies, particularly tubulointerstitial lesions, were observed in 12 of 65 patients with cirrhosis who underwent a transvenous kidney biopsy. 4 However, it is important to emphasize that the indication for the kidney biopsy was proteinuria, hematuria and/or chronic kidney impairment, while there is no specific mention of whether some patients had type-1 HRS. To our knowledge, only 3 studies have described the histological findings in kidneys of patients with the acute form of HRS. Koppel et al. 5 reported the results of successful transplantation of cadaveric kidneys from 6 patients with cirrhosis and HRS (serum creatinine from 4.8 to 11.8 mg/dl) to patients with end-stage renal disease. The mean duration of HRS was greater than