2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.05.111
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Newly-designed traditional lime mortar with a phase change material as an additive

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
14
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
1
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For all the proposed materials, was also observed a decrease in the capillary water adsorption coefficient. Similar approaches were published by Moropoulou et al [116] (using several pozzolanic additives), Andrejkovičová et al [117] (using palygorskite and metakaolin), Ventolà et al [118] (using commercial phase changing materials), Rosato et al [119] (using commercial cellulose nano-fibrils), Gour et al [120] (using natural polymers) or Pavlík et al [121] (using crushed lava granulates). However, regarding the reconstruction/consolidation mortars, the best approach, in our opinion, is the one presented by Stefanidou et al [122], respectively designing the mortars according to the nature of the natural stone (in the cases presented by the authors marl limestone, nummulitic limestone, marble, biogenic calcitic sandstones), and as, often as possible, reclaiming local materials.…”
Section: Consolidation and Protection Agentssupporting
confidence: 55%
“…For all the proposed materials, was also observed a decrease in the capillary water adsorption coefficient. Similar approaches were published by Moropoulou et al [116] (using several pozzolanic additives), Andrejkovičová et al [117] (using palygorskite and metakaolin), Ventolà et al [118] (using commercial phase changing materials), Rosato et al [119] (using commercial cellulose nano-fibrils), Gour et al [120] (using natural polymers) or Pavlík et al [121] (using crushed lava granulates). However, regarding the reconstruction/consolidation mortars, the best approach, in our opinion, is the one presented by Stefanidou et al [122], respectively designing the mortars according to the nature of the natural stone (in the cases presented by the authors marl limestone, nummulitic limestone, marble, biogenic calcitic sandstones), and as, often as possible, reclaiming local materials.…”
Section: Consolidation and Protection Agentssupporting
confidence: 55%
“…When looking at the other similar studies, summarized in Table 4, it appears that only five of them use the same PCM as in the present study. Besides, as stated before, some of them only deal with DSC [40,45,82] and the properties of a real macroscopic sample are addressed solely by [35], although only the thermal conductivity is involved in the latter paper. More importantly, when dealing with the thermal conductivity, very often, only an overall or effective value is furnished and no distinction is done between the concrete with PCM in solid or in liquid state, contrary to what is currently done here.…”
Section: 4%mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite its small volume, the mortar is an integral part of the structure, which is a very effective and crucial material for masonry structures. Lime-based mortar was firstly used in the Middle East and Anatolia almost 14,000 years ago (Ventola et al 2013). Recently, lime-based mortar has been commonly used in both repairs and restoration applications of historical and ancient structures (Ventola et al 2011;Lanas and Alvarez, 2003).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%