The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2008.04.061
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Newborn Screening for Cystic Fibrosis: A Lesson in Public Health Disparities

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
42
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
(67 reference statements)
0
42
0
Order By: Relevance
“…With nationwide CF NBS underway, the research climate shifted from one focused on identifying the benefits of screening to one focused on identifying the best screening methodology. [5][6][7] Although wide variations in screening methods and cutoff values currently exist throughout the United States and across the world, 6,8 almost all algorithms begin by evaluating IRT 1 levels by using a dried blood specimen collected between 1 and 5 days of age with the second tier being either a second IRT or DNA analysis for CF transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) mutations. 9 Further testing and referrals are then made based on the particular screening method in use by the state.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With nationwide CF NBS underway, the research climate shifted from one focused on identifying the benefits of screening to one focused on identifying the best screening methodology. [5][6][7] Although wide variations in screening methods and cutoff values currently exist throughout the United States and across the world, 6,8 almost all algorithms begin by evaluating IRT 1 levels by using a dried blood specimen collected between 1 and 5 days of age with the second tier being either a second IRT or DNA analysis for CF transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) mutations. 9 Further testing and referrals are then made based on the particular screening method in use by the state.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The screening panel should include more rather than less mutations to avoid disproportionate number of missed screened cases (false negatives) in USA ethnic minorities. In order to capture a high percentage of cases involving ethnic minorities, full sequencing of the CFTR gene is required (Ross, 2008). Kammesheidt et al (2006) have shown the feasibility of temporal temperature gradient electrophoresis-based full sequence analysis and targeted sequencing from DNA in newborn blood specimens which can increase the identification of mutations in ethnic minorities.…”
Section: Irt/dna and Irt/dna/irt Protocols In Neonatal Screeningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Children whose sample has at least one mutation or whose sample has a very high initial IRT measurement are asked to provide a second sample for a second IRT measurement. Only those with an elevated IRT levels on the second sample undergo sweat testing (Ross, 2008). Corbetta et al (2002) assessed the performance of IRT/DNA/IRT based on IRT followed by direct CFTR gene analysis (based on a panel of up to 31 mutations) in hypertrypsinaemic newborn infants in Italy.…”
Section: Irt/dna and Irt/dna/irt Protocols In Neonatal Screeningmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations