1992
DOI: 10.1016/0925-6164(92)90028-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Newborn screening for biotinidase deficiency: pilot study and follow-up of identified cases

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

1
1
1

Year Published

1994
1994
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
1
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, the incidence found in the current study was higher than that observed worldwide and in many countries. Nevertheless, pilot newborn screening Wolf et al (2005) studies in isolated regions or selected groups have disclosed higher incidences (1:4,500 to 1:14,000) than that reported in the present research (Thodi et al 2013;Dunkel et al 1989;Lawler et al 1992;Sarafoglou et al 2009). In Brazil, the available prevalence rates are divergent.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 74%
“…Thus, the incidence found in the current study was higher than that observed worldwide and in many countries. Nevertheless, pilot newborn screening Wolf et al (2005) studies in isolated regions or selected groups have disclosed higher incidences (1:4,500 to 1:14,000) than that reported in the present research (Thodi et al 2013;Dunkel et al 1989;Lawler et al 1992;Sarafoglou et al 2009). In Brazil, the available prevalence rates are divergent.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 74%
“…Nevertheless, pilot newborn screening Wild (?) ¼ coding and splicing regions of BTD gene corresponded to the wild sequence, but promoter and intronic regions were not completely sequenced a Newly described mutation predicted to affect protein function (see text) b Newly described mutation predicted not to affect protein function (see text) c A silent variant [c.1284C>T (Y428Y)] was also detected together with the pathogenic variant p.P497S, as reported by Wolf et al (2005) studies in isolated regions or selected groups have disclosed higher incidences (1:4,500 to 1:14,000) than that reported in the present research (Thodi et al 2013;Dunkel et al 1989;Lawler et al 1992;Sarafoglou et al 2009). In Brazil, the available prevalence rates are divergent.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 49%
“…The early detection of the disease and administration of pharmacological doses of biotin are necessary to prevent physical and neurological abnormalities of affected infants; therefore, many countries include BD in their newborn screening program. 11 Due to the yet incomplete screening in a variety of countries, only rough estimates of incidence data are available, ranging from 1:33,000 to 1:500,000 9 for profound biotinidase deficiency (0−10% of the mean normal activity) and from 1:14,000 12 to 1:129,000 13 for partial deficiency (10−30% activity). For BD patient stratification, quantitative enzyme activity measurements are necessary.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%