Newborn hearing screening results of refugees living in our city and the factors affecting the results

Yücel, Abitter; Alataş, Necat; Yücel, Hilal; Güllüev, Mustafa; Özsöz, Ekrem; Uğur, Cüneyt

doi:10.1016/j.ijporl.2019.05.019

Cited by 11 publications

(7 citation statements)

References 11 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…16 Yücel et al performed TEOAE test in Syrian refugee babies, they found out that 7 out of 16 infants with very low birth weight and 19 babies out of 96 with low birth weight, had referred results unilaterally or in the bilateral ear and there was a significant relationship between the presence of hearing loss and the presence and absence of low birth weight. 17 This is also similar to our study, where we observed REFER results in babies who weigh 1500-2500 grams in unilateral ear by 20% and 100% in bilateral ear in extremely low birth weight baby 1 st TEOAE screening test. Our study result matched the finding of Korres et al research where the hearing status of very low birth weight infants was assessed just before their discharge from hospital which shows 20.8% of VLBW newborns have failed in the OAE test while 79.2% of them passed.…”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 91%

A study on hearing screening using oto-acoustic emissions in newborns delivered by normal vaginal delivery and lower segment caesarean section

Appathurai,

Jaiswal,

Saha

et al. 2024

Int J Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: Hearing is one of the most complex systems of the human body and is a skill involved in the human social evolution. It has been estimated that around 900 million people by the end of 2050, will probably suffer from hearing loss. Our study aims to find out the correlation between the mode of delivery and the effect it has on newborn hearing screening. Methods: The Prospective study on 136 Newborn babies who were delivered in JLN Hospital & Research Centre, Bhilai, Chhattisgarh during October 2020 to August 2021. After obtaining detailed history all newborns underwent TEOAE screening and the data were then compared with the available literature. Results: We observed normal vaginal delivery newborns have passed the test by 97.91% and 89.58% when compared to LSCS delivered infants 97.15% and 86.36% in screening and diagnostic frequency respectively. COVID-19 infection was seen in 2.94% of pregnant mothers in the 3rd trimester. There were no babies who required BERA in our study Conclusions: Normal vaginally delivered newborns have higher pass rate in TEOAE test when compared with LSCS delivered babies. Covid-19 infection in antenatal mother can influence the outcome in 1st TEOAE tests. The pass rate in TEOAE hearing test in the screening frequency is found to be greater when compared with diagnostic frequencies. In a developing country like India, Universal hearing screening programs needs to be reached out to the most remote parts of the country, in order to identify at risk infants for hearing loss.

show abstract

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 91%

A study on hearing screening using oto-acoustic emissions in newborns delivered by normal vaginal delivery and lower segment caesarean section

Appathurai,

Jaiswal,

Saha

et al. 2024

Int J Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…When a three-stage protocol was used, generally the first two stages included OAE (DP/TE) screening followed by AABR/auditory brainstem response (ABR) screening54–62 or included OAE (DP/TE) for all three stages 63 64. Only one study reported combining tympanometry and TEOAE in the initial stage of its three-stage screening protocol 65. Studies from Turkey (n=7) reported a three-stage screening protocol 55–60 65…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Only one study reported combining tympanometry and TEOAE in the initial stage of its three-stage screening protocol 65. Studies from Turkey (n=7) reported a three-stage screening protocol 55–60 65…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Early hearing detection and intervention (EHDI) programmes for infants and young children in low-income and middle-income countries in Asia: a systematic review

Ramkumar

Nair³

et al. 2023

bmjpo

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

BackgroundEarly hearing detection and intervention (EHDI) measures initiated in high-income countries (HICs) were attempted in low-income and middle-income countries (L&MICs). However, information regarding the models of EHDI, context-specific adaptations made to strategies and outcomes are not known.AimsThe aims of this systematic review were to identify the various models of EHDI used in Asian L&MICs in the published scientific literature and to describe their efficacy and validity.MethodsThe studies were eligible if the programme was from Asian L&MICs, implemented for children below 6 years of age and published between 2010 and 2021. Google Scholar, PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, EBSCOHost and EBSCO–CINAHL were used to find articles. Data were extracted from each selected article, and the risk of bias was assessed. The search results were summarised using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses flow diagram. For primary outcomes, narrative synthesis was used, and forest plots were generated for secondary outcomes.ResultsIn all, 82 studies were included, and these studies were divided into two categories: newborn and infant screening programmes and screening programmes for older children. Predominantly, a two-stage objective otoacoustic emission (Distortion Product/Transient Evoked) or automated auditory brainstem response screening, followed by a detailed auditory brainstem response to confirm the hearing loss, was used in newborn and infant screening programmes. Audiologists were the most frequent screening personnel. Screening of older children was mostly done by otolaryngologists, school instructors and nurses. They performed a single-stage pure tone audiometry screening followed by a detailed examination.ConclusionThe screening tools and protocols used were similar to those used in HICs. However, no uniform protocols were followed within each country. Long-term viability of EHDI programmes was not known as there was limited information on impact outcomes such as cost–benefit.PROSPERO registration numberCRD42021240341.

show abstract

“…They are facing with many problems on journey from homel and to new home. This situation becomes more difficult for pregnant women (10). Such reasons as the fact that refugees experience food and shelter problems due to war and compulsory immigration conditions, safety concerns and economic problems make the pregnancy period more difficult for pregnant women and refugee mothers are subject to malnutrition and stress throughout pregnancy (11).…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Newborn Hearing Screening Results of Duzce Province in the Western Black Sea Region

Belada¹,

Köder²

2021

Düzce Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Enstitüsü Dergisi

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

We aimed to evaluate the results of newborn hearing screening (NHS) conducted at Düzce Atatürk State Hospital, and review the results with the relevant literature. Material and Methods: The hearing screening results of 20071 newborns whose hearing screening was conducted at Düzce Atatürk State hospital between January 2011 and December 2018 were evaluated retrospectively in this study. Refugees were not included in the study. Newborns without risk factors who came to the first test were evaluated with transient evoked otoacoustic emissions (TEOAE). If they failed from the first screening test were evaluated again 15 days later with TEOAE. Newborns who failed the second screening test were evaluated a third time with ABR. Newborns with risk factors were first evaluated with auditory brainstem response (ABR).The risky newborns who failed the first screening test were evaluated second time with ABR. Results: Hearing loss was present in 62 (0.30%) of the 20071 newborns and was unilateral in 35 (0.17%) and bilateral in 27 (0.13%) subjects. Conclusion:For the rehabilitation of babies with hearing loss, their treatment should be started as early as possible. Newborn hearing screening tests are a screening program that has been successfully applied in our country for many years and enables the detection of babies with hearing loss. With this screening program, babies with hearing loss can be detected at an early stage and their treatment and rehabilitation can be provided. The results of our study are consistent with other hearing screening results from our country.

show abstract

Newborn hearing screening results of refugees living in our city and the factors affecting the results

Cited by 11 publications

References 11 publications

A study on hearing screening using oto-acoustic emissions in newborns delivered by normal vaginal delivery and lower segment caesarean section

A study on hearing screening using oto-acoustic emissions in newborns delivered by normal vaginal delivery and lower segment caesarean section

Early hearing detection and intervention (EHDI) programmes for infants and young children in low-income and middle-income countries in Asia: a systematic review

Newborn Hearing Screening Results of Duzce Province in the Western Black Sea Region

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About