Newborn Hearing Screening Results

Oğuzhan, Oğuz; Özbey, Ali Osman; Yıldırım, Yusuf; Altınışık, Mücahit

doi:10.5505/kjms.2016.65882

Cited by 2 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 10 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…In the current study, the rate of bilateral hearing loss was determined to be 0.14% (n=2) and unilateral hearing loss at 0.07% (n=1). Previous studies conducted in the Turkish cities of Istanbul, Konya, Izmir, Bolu, Muğla, Diyarbakır, Van, and Şanlıurfa have reported hearing loss rates of 0.27%, 0.15%, 0.21%, 0.17%, 0.25%, 0.30% and 0.4%, respectively (15)(16)(17)(18)(19)(20)(21)(22). In the current study of 1417 infants, when rates were evaluated of patients diagnosed with SOM, bilateral hearing loss was determined at the rate of 0.14% (n=2) and unilateral hearing loss at 0.07% (n=1).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Generally, middle ear effusions reduce or completely suppress EOAE amplitudes; negative pressures affect EOAE at around 2khz [6]. Therefore, when pneumatic otoscopic examination and tympanogram are used together in infants and children where OAE pure sound audiometry cannot When hearing is normal after the screening tests, the number of infants who had been referred from centres having failed the first and second tests, passed the test the third time after detailed examination and treatment, is not at a negligible rate of 0.3%-0.4% [15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22]. Psychiatric disorders such as postnatal depression and delirium are seen at the rate of 0.1%-0.2% [23].…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

The importance of otoscopic examination in the hearing screening of neonates

Sarıca¹

2018

Ann Clin Anal Med

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Aim: Permanent hearing loss in children is congenital in more than 80% of cases. Hearing screenings of newborns are important in the early determination of hearing loss. The aim of this study was to draw attention to the importance of a careful otoscopic examination before hearing screening in newborns. Material and Method: In this retrospective study, the records of patients who underwent a hearing test according to the hearing screening program in our clinic between January 2015 and January 2017 were examined. Evaluation was made of patient data with findings such as vernix caseosa, impacted cerumen, serous otitis media, external otitis, and ear canal anomalies in the notes from the otoscopic examination conducted prior to the evoked otoacoustic emission (EOAE) test.Results: The EOAE test was applied to 1417 patients immediately following otoscopic examination. The EOAE was normal in 1266 patients, while no response could be obtained from the ears bilaterally in 91 patients and unilaterally in 60 patients. After follow-up and treatment of patients with serous otitis, ear debris, or vernix caseosa determined in the otoscopic examination, hearing loss was determined with a repeated EOAE test as bilateral very advanced in 2 patients, unilateral very advanced in 1 patient, moderately advanced in 2 patients, at 30 dB in 5 patients, and hearing neuropathy was considered in 1 patient. Discussion: The significant improvement in hearing loss after treatment of vernix caseosa, cerumen, and serous otitis media has shown how important the otoscopic examination as part of the initial hearing screening of newborns.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

The importance of otoscopic examination in the hearing screening of neonates

Sarıca¹

2018

Ann Clin Anal Med

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Neonatal Hearing Screening Results with Screening ABR Protocol

Sarı

BÜLBÜL²,

ERSÜ

2022

Pediatric Practice and Research

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Aim:The study aimed to present the results of our universal newborn hearing screening results at a secondary care hospital in Mardin by ABR and review with the literature. Materials and method: A total of 7134 newborns were screened between January 2021 and December 2021using ABR as first, second, third steps. Newborns who failed and at risk are referred to reference hospital and the results were obtained from the records. Result:Of the 7134 newborns,6179 are first test, 955 were retested. Failure in first test was 13.3%. 235(3.2%) of patients were referred to reference center. 0.5% were referred due to test failure, 2.7% were referred due to risk. 27 patients(3.7%) were obtained from records of reference center as abnormal results in clinical Automated Brain stem Response(ABR).16 of them (0.5%) were congenital hearing loss(CHL) who need rehabilitation. Conclusion: Incidence of hearing loss and the rate of failure in first and second test were consistent with the literature. However, reference rate increased due to reference caused by risk factors.

show abstract

Newborn Hearing Screening Results

Cited by 2 publications

References 10 publications

The importance of otoscopic examination in the hearing screening of neonates

The importance of otoscopic examination in the hearing screening of neonates

Neonatal Hearing Screening Results with Screening ABR Protocol

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About