2012
DOI: 10.1007/s12229-012-9102-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

New Zealand Eocene, Oligocene and Miocene Macrofossil and Pollen Records and Modern Plant Distributions in the Southern Hemisphere

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
58
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 70 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 74 publications
0
58
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Fleming 1979) that part of the Recent biota is of ancient origin, long preceding the Oligocene inundation and most parsimoniously of vicariant origin (Gibbs 2006;Worthy et al 2006;Jones et al 2009;Tennyson et al 2010). Such an understanding is also supported by recent investigations of the palaeofloras from the Oligocene to Miocene interval, which show no evidence for any loss of diversity or species turnover during the period of maximum marine transgression (Lee DE et al 2012). …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…Fleming 1979) that part of the Recent biota is of ancient origin, long preceding the Oligocene inundation and most parsimoniously of vicariant origin (Gibbs 2006;Worthy et al 2006;Jones et al 2009;Tennyson et al 2010). Such an understanding is also supported by recent investigations of the palaeofloras from the Oligocene to Miocene interval, which show no evidence for any loss of diversity or species turnover during the period of maximum marine transgression (Lee DE et al 2012). …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…One of the richest Miocene fossil sites is Foulden Maar in Otago, South Island, which to date has yielded a wide range of leaf, fl ower, and fruit taxa ( Bannister et al, 2005 ;Lee et al, 2012 ). Most of the plant macrofossils are isolated, more or less complete, compressed mummifi ed leaves of which about 45% are from the family Lauraceae, including common species with affi nities to Cryptocarya R.Br., Beilschmiedia Nees, and Litsea Lam.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most of the plant macrofossils are isolated, more or less complete, compressed mummifi ed leaves of which about 45% are from the family Lauraceae, including common species with affi nities to Cryptocarya R.Br., Beilschmiedia Nees, and Litsea Lam. ( Bannister et al, 2012 ). The remainder represents a diverse range of families, including Araliaceae, Cunoniaceae, Elaeocarpaceae, Euphorbiaceae, Menispermaceae, Myrsinaceae, Myrtaceae, Proteaceae, and Sterculiaceae ( Lee et al, 2012 ).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, Lauraceae and Proteaceae (both over 10 taxa) were highly diverse during the Cenozoic [8,22], but currently have few species (under 3), whereas Rubiaceae and Pittosporaceae remain species rich (both over 20).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%