1973
DOI: 10.1136/ard.32.4.354
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

New York clinical criteria for ankylosing spondylitis. A statistical evaluation.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
68
1
4

Year Published

1993
1993
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 206 publications
(73 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
68
1
4
Order By: Relevance
“…All PsA patients met the Moll-Wright criteria (13). All SNSA patients had sacroiliitis; 4 of the SNSA patients (3 men, 1 woman) were suspected of having ankylosing spondylitis, but they did not meet the New York criteria (14). OA patients did not show any signs of inflammation; their erythrocyte sedimentation rates (ESRs) were Ͻ30 mm/hour.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All PsA patients met the Moll-Wright criteria (13). All SNSA patients had sacroiliitis; 4 of the SNSA patients (3 men, 1 woman) were suspected of having ankylosing spondylitis, but they did not meet the New York criteria (14). OA patients did not show any signs of inflammation; their erythrocyte sedimentation rates (ESRs) were Ͻ30 mm/hour.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The medical records of patients identified as possible cases were then reviewed by the investigators. Those patients considered likely to have SpA were invited to attend special clinics for interview and examination in order to verify their diagnoses and collect the data necessary for evaluating the ESSG criteria All 104 patients included in this study fulfilled one of the following sets of criteria: for AS, the New York criteria (8); for RS, the 1982 preliminary criteria of the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) (formerly, the American Rheumatism Association) (9); for IBD-related arthritis, PsA, and ReA following dysenteric illness, the diagnostic guidelines specified in the ninth edition of the Primer on the Rheumatic Diseases (lo), or for USpA, our previously developed working criteria (3,4). These working criteria consisted of objective evidence of inflammatory joint involvement observed by a physician plus any 3 items from the following list: as part of the presenting illness, asymmetric joint involvement, predominantly of the lower extremities; enthesopathy; sterile joint effusion; persistent low back pain or physical findings consistent with sacroiliitis; mild anemia and elevated erythrocyte sedimentation rate, not accounted for by the presence of other disease; or, based on historical information in the patient's medical record, evidence of an intermittent disease course, with recurrent episodes of joint involvement or the occurrence of iritis or uveitis, diagnosed by a physician.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Blood samples were collected at least 12 h after the last dosage of immunosuppressants to minimize the drug effects. The grade of sacroiliitis was identified according to the New York criteria [22] and the lumbar spine involvement was graded by the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Radiology Index (BASRI) [23] in AS patients.…”
Section: Patients and Controlsmentioning
confidence: 99%