Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.econlet.2012.03.029
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

New weighting scheme for the dimensions in multidimensional poverty indices

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
17
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Weights determine the extent to which the selected attributes contribute to well-being and the degree by which we can substitute one attribute for another, interacting with the functional form used to aggregate dimensions. This can be easily seen by defining individual well-being S β as the weighted mean of order β of the achievements in the r dimensions, as suggested for instance by Maasoumi (1986), 13 See Cerioli and Zani (1990), Cheli et al (1994), Cheli (1995), Cheli and Lemmi (1995), Chiappero Martinetti (1994Martinetti ( , 2000, Betti et al (2002), Dagum and Costa (2004), Qizilbash and Clark (2005), , , Belhadj (2012), and Belhadj and Limam (2012). Deutsch and Silber (2005), Pérez-Mayo (2007), D'Ambrosio et al (2011 compare empirical results for multidimensional measures of poverty based on the fuzzy sets approach with those derived from applying alternative approaches (axiomatic approach, Information Theory, efficiency analysis, latent class analysis).…”
Section: Weighting Of Dimensionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Weights determine the extent to which the selected attributes contribute to well-being and the degree by which we can substitute one attribute for another, interacting with the functional form used to aggregate dimensions. This can be easily seen by defining individual well-being S β as the weighted mean of order β of the achievements in the r dimensions, as suggested for instance by Maasoumi (1986), 13 See Cerioli and Zani (1990), Cheli et al (1994), Cheli (1995), Cheli and Lemmi (1995), Chiappero Martinetti (1994Martinetti ( , 2000, Betti et al (2002), Dagum and Costa (2004), Qizilbash and Clark (2005), , , Belhadj (2012), and Belhadj and Limam (2012). Deutsch and Silber (2005), Pérez-Mayo (2007), D'Ambrosio et al (2011 compare empirical results for multidimensional measures of poverty based on the fuzzy sets approach with those derived from applying alternative approaches (axiomatic approach, Information Theory, efficiency analysis, latent class analysis).…”
Section: Weighting Of Dimensionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many scholars measured the poverty situation of the farmers by constructing the poverty measurement indexes using UNDP on the MPI method, double critical value method, AF multidimensional poverty measurement, participatory poverty assessment (PPA), monetary approach to poverty Mathematical Problems in Engineering assessment, multidimensional poverty indicators (MDI), and other methods from income, education, health, living standards, and other aspects [16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30]. (3) View of poverty measurement: whether it is measure of quality of life, measure of happiness degree, or measure of poverty degree, many scholars break the traditional one-dimensional measure method and propose to measure from multiple dimensions and establish properly evaluation indexes [31][32][33]. More and more authors used fuzzy set theory [34] to measure poverty from multidimensional perspective [35][36][37][38][39].…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Valoración de las relaciones entre actores Está dada de acuerdo a la frecuencia de interacción entre un mismo par de actores. Para ello, se utilizó el método de ponderación de pesos iguales (Belhadj, 2012), donde a las relaciones identificadas en cada fuente de información se les asignó un mismo valor de 0.25. De esta forma, el peso total de la relación entre un par de actores viene dada por la reiteración de la misma en las diferentes fuentes consultadas.…”
Section: Paso 2 Descripción De Los Vínculos Entre Actoresunclassified