New Virtual Reality for Architectural Investigations

Kreutzberg, Anette

doi:10.52842/conf.ecaade.2014.2.253

Cited by 6 publications

(7 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…In basic design courses, two papers for 2D drawing/3D modeling [90,92] and one paper for design review [17] applied IVR. Six papers in urbanism [31,60,85,[105][106][107] and two papers in interior design [65,71] used IVR for design review. Moreover, in design studios, seven papers for design review [2,4,15,26,30,53,119], four papers for 2D drawing/3D modeling [39][40][41]117], and three papers for stakeholder engagement [48,62,118] analyzed IVR.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…IVR cannot be capable of detailed architectural modeling to fully meet the requirements for building modeling due to the 2D drawings/3D modeling detail levels in some studies [39,90,92,114,117]. Due to the side effects, IVR may lead to negative ergonomic situations for AECO/FM users studying for long hours [9,16,44,49,52,65,117].…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…These novel frameworks were presented only in training in building healthy/safety, training for operational tasks, and fire/ safety/access assessment. Furthermore, despite the short duration of the experiments in some studies [9,16,44,49,52,65,117], IVR barriers such as nausea, motion sickness, dizziness, and fatigue emerged.…”

Section: Usability and Side Effects (Process Factor) F I G U R Ementioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Immersive virtual reality in AECO/FM to enhance education: Systematic literature review and future directions

Tastan

Tong

2023

Comp Applic In Engineering

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Immersive virtual reality (IVR) is considered as an effective and efficient instructional tool for architecture, engineering, construction, operation, and facility management (AECO/FM) education. However, it is essential to systematically evaluate them to obtain consolidated evidence on the impact of IVR applications. Thus, the aim of this article is to present the state‐of‐the‐art on all AECO/FM use cases, including learning theories/models, all key factors, and experimental design, and to suggest future directions for IVR research. This review follows a systematic literature review methodology to analyze 79 papers between 2013 and 2022. The results show that learning theories/models are not sufficiently applied. There is consensus that IVR influences affective factors positively. It is necessary to consider task type, task complexity, virtual environment design, and ergonomics of IVR tools in terms of cognitive factors. Cognitive/affective factors associated with learning performance should be examined in depth to develop more effective learning methods. Future studies should design and conduct experimental procedures with more scientific rigor.

show abstract

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Usability and Side Effects (Process Factor) F I G U R Ementioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Immersive virtual reality in AECO/FM to enhance education: Systematic literature review and future directions

Tastan

Tong

2023

Comp Applic In Engineering

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…As VR systems become more practical and sophisticated, concerns about VR sickness increase (Kreutzberg 2014). VR sickness, which occurs when experiencing VR applications, has symptoms similar to common motion sickness, such as vomiting, cold sensation, numbness of limbs, nausea, sweating, and headache (LaViola 2000, Groen andBos 2008).…”

Section: Literature Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…VR sickness causes a mismatch between the user's vision and vestibular sensation (Dichgans and Brandt 1978, Figure 1 Differences in the appearance of objects due to differences in relative velocity (i.e. motion vector): bridge structure (near view) and mountains (far view) when crossing a river, for example Kreutzberg 2014). In a VR session, the user's body in the real world does not move much, so there is no vestibular input, but on the other hand, the field of view shifts as the user moves within the virtual world.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%