2020
DOI: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-41469/v1
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

New View on the Organization and Evolution of Palaeognathae Mitogenomes Poses The Question on the Ancestral Gene Rearrangement in Aves

Abstract: BackgroundBird mitogenomes differ from other vertebrates in gene rearrangement. The most common avian gene order, first identified in Gallus gallus, is considered ancestral for all Aves. However, other rearrangements including a duplicated control region and neighboring genes have been reported in many representatives of avian orders. The repeated regions can be easily omitted due to inappropriate DNA amplification or genome sequencing, and may thus be readily overlooked. This raises a question about the actua… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 111 publications
(218 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our result supports the hypothesis that nad6 duplication could be widespread in Procellariiformes ( Torres et al 2019 ), and, like cob , could have undergone various events of deletion or addition during the diversification of the order. Nevertheless, because some of the reported duplications could be artificial ( Urantówka et al 2020 ; Formenti et al 2021 ), to fully identify the true number of gene duplications/deletions will require additional and specific experimental analyses.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our result supports the hypothesis that nad6 duplication could be widespread in Procellariiformes ( Torres et al 2019 ), and, like cob , could have undergone various events of deletion or addition during the diversification of the order. Nevertheless, because some of the reported duplications could be artificial ( Urantówka et al 2020 ; Formenti et al 2021 ), to fully identify the true number of gene duplications/deletions will require additional and specific experimental analyses.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%