2021
DOI: 10.1017/prm.2021.17
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

New variable martingale Hardy spaces

Abstract: We investigate various variable martingale Hardy spaces corresponding to variable Lebesgue spaces $\mathcal {L}_{p(\cdot )}$ defined by rearrangement functions. In particular, we show that the dual of martingale variable Hardy space $\mathcal {H}_{p(\cdot )}^{s}$ with $0<p_{-}\leq p_{+}\leq 1$ can be described as a BMO-type space and establish martingale inequalities among these martingale Hardy spaces. Furthermore, we give … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Some years later, we have systematically studied and developed this theory in [16]. The applications of variable martingale Hardy spaces to Fourier analysis were investigated in [16] while its applications to stochastic integrals in [18]. Martingale Musielak-Orlicz Hardy spaces were considered in Xie et al [47][48][49].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some years later, we have systematically studied and developed this theory in [16]. The applications of variable martingale Hardy spaces to Fourier analysis were investigated in [16] while its applications to stochastic integrals in [18]. Martingale Musielak-Orlicz Hardy spaces were considered in Xie et al [47][48][49].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Remark 4.4. In [25,Theorem 5.4], the authors obtained a similar result for martingale Hardy spaces associated with  𝑝(⋅) (Ω) under the condition that 𝑝(⋅) ∈  0 ([0, 1]) is locally log-Hölder continuous. As mentioned in Section 2.1, the condition we impose on 𝑝(⋅) and 𝑞(⋅) is weaker.…”
Section: Boundedness Of Fractional Integrals On Variable Hardy-lorent...mentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Then, 𝜏 𝑘 is nondecreasing (see [25,Theorem 3.6]). Also, it is easy to see that {𝜈 𝑘 = 𝑗} ⊂ {𝜏 𝑘 ≤ 𝑗 − 1}, which implies that 𝜏 𝑘 < 𝜈 𝑘 on the set {𝜈 𝑘 < ∞}.…”
Section: Atomic Characterization For  𝑴 𝒑(⋅)𝒒(⋅) (𝛀)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations