2021
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2112.11463
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

New Variable Hot Subdwarf Stars Identified from Anomalous Gaia Flux Errors, Observed by TESS, and Classified via Fourier Diagnostics

Brad N. Barlow,
Kyle A. Corcoran,
Isabelle M. Parker
et al.

Abstract: Hot subdwarf stars are mostly stripped red giants that can exhibit photometric variations due to stellar pulsations, eclipses, the reflection effect, ellipsoidal modulation, and Doppler beaming. Detailed studies of their light curves help constrain stellar parameters through asteroseismological analyses or binary light curve modeling and generally improve our capacity to draw a statistically meaningful picture of this enigmatic stage of stellar evolution. From an analysis of Gaia DR2 flux errors, we have ident… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…That means that astrophysical variable stars should have a larger scatter than predicted for a constant star with a comparable magnitude. See Guidry et al (2021) and Barlow et al (2021) for more details. Both applied this method to study the variability of white dwarf sources in ZTF (Guidry et al 2021) as well as variable sdB candidates in TESS (Barlow et al 2021).…”
Section: Comparison To the π‘£π‘Žπ‘Ÿπ‘–π‘›π‘‘π‘’π‘₯ Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…That means that astrophysical variable stars should have a larger scatter than predicted for a constant star with a comparable magnitude. See Guidry et al (2021) and Barlow et al (2021) for more details. Both applied this method to study the variability of white dwarf sources in ZTF (Guidry et al 2021) as well as variable sdB candidates in TESS (Barlow et al 2021).…”
Section: Comparison To the π‘£π‘Žπ‘Ÿπ‘–π‘›π‘‘π‘’π‘₯ Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…See Guidry et al (2021) and Barlow et al (2021) for more details. Both applied this method to study the variability of white dwarf sources in ZTF (Guidry et al 2021) as well as variable sdB candidates in TESS (Barlow et al 2021).…”
Section: Comparison To the π‘£π‘Žπ‘Ÿπ‘–π‘›π‘‘π‘’π‘₯ Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%